Talk:Arakan forest turtle

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Turtles Mid‑importance

Arakan forest turtle is part of WikiProject Turtles, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use turtle resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.TurtlesWikipedia:WikiProject TurtlesTemplate:WikiProject Turtlesturtle articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Interested in helping WikiProject Turtles? See the project discussion or the to-do below:

Get involved with WikiProject Turtles discussion.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Copyedit : Green sea turtle!
Expand : Emydidae, Tortoise, Spotted turtle, Glyptemys
Photo : Find a photo of turtle articles needing a photo
Stubs : Expand a stub article.
Update : Emydidae, Tortoise
Other : * Out of date turtle articles abound, mainly taxonomy issues, get a list here and scroll down for articles. Taxonomy information is available in WikiProject Turtles resources.
- {{Extinct turtles}} and fossil forms of both living and extinct turtles requires attention:many extinct articles require either expansion or creation and sources seems hard to come by. A list of fossil forms is being compiled so progress can be charted.
- Patrol: recent changes to turtle articles and check for improvements or errors.

Quote: "It may be too late to study this species in its native habitat."

The statement is a blatent opinion.

SIgn your comments. And I agree. I'm removing the statement. --Adam Wang 00:07, 14 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Another removed statement edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The claim that there are only 17 such turtles left in the wild is inappropriate. The cited sources (including the May 1 AP article) clearly state that no one knows how many may still exist in the wild, and contradicts this statement in the article about "17 are left". Additionally, the assertion that there are only 17 in the wild is unsupported as well. The statement had to be removed. - 1965Tim 20:30, 1 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic