Talk:April 2014 lunar eclipse/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by TLSuda in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Promoted 22:03, 22 July 2014.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TLSuda (talk · contribs) 18:52, 8 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Greetings! I know you've waited a few months for a review, but I have good news! I'm stuck in a tin can for 5 hours tomorrow late night UTC, so I'm going to use that time wisely to review this article. I expect to have the review posted in the early morning hours UTC the following day. (Approximately less than 36 hours from this post.) I look forward to reading and reviewing this article. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 18:15, 8 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Great, I look forward to seeing what you have to say. --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:38, 8 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Review edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    Just a few short issues. Add a period at the end of captions that are complete sentences. Periods at the end of notes that are complete sentences. Instead of "Related eclipse" as the sub-head, that section covers more Background about the eclipse (including the tetrad.) Let me know what you think/make changes, and it will be ready to be promoted. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 21:43, 10 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
My apologies about the delay in responding - I was on vacation. I will address the concerns within the next 24 hours or so. Thanks for your review! --ThaddeusB (talk) 17:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
@ThaddeusB: Whats the status? TLSuda (talk) 20:35, 21 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
I have made the requested changes and a few other minor improvements. Sorry for delay. --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:45, 22 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
It looks good, great work. I'm happy to promote this to Good Article! Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 22:03, 22 July 2014 (UTC)Reply