Talk:Anuel AA/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gatoclass (talk · contribs) 03:55, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   His father is Afro-Puerto Rican and his mother is of White Puerto Rican descent, raised in Milwaukee; Anuel AA has explained - who was raised in Milwaukee, his mother? It isn't clear from the sentence.

   Billboard Hot Latin Songs-charting singles - this is a muddled phrase with unclear meaning.

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   The sentence Being able to record his voice over the phone, Anuel AA mostly participated in collaborations with other artists such as Nicky Jam, Cosculluela, Bad Bunny and J Balvin is unsourced. The "Awards and nominations" table is also unsourced.

   Quite a few of the sources are missing the "work/website" or equivalent field.

   Never mind, fixed it myself.

   B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Hey there, thanks for volunteering to review the article! I appreciate it. Basilisk4u (talk) 00:08, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Basilisk4u, I returned to remind you that you only need to source the "Awards and nominations" section in order for this GA to pass, but I see that somebody has since added a number of new entries to the list. These too will have to be sourced before the article can be passed. Gatoclass (talk) 08:37, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Gatoclass! I will get on it. Basilisk4u (talk) 16:25, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello again Basilisk4u, apologies for the delay in getting back to this. The article looks pretty much ready for promotion, but I'm thinking it would be better to leave it now until the Billboard Latin Music and Latin Grammy awards were announced so that the table can be completed, would that be okay with you? Gatoclass (talk) 12:15, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Gatoclass, if it's ready for promotion now, and the only expected change is to the table after the awards are announced on November 19, it should be promoted now. There's no reason not to AGF that the article will be updated properly a few weeks from now; after six months, this is not a reason to delay promotion any further. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:19, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

I agree with this, it's not a lot of work to update the awards after winners are announced and I can update them when the time comes, if someone else doesn't beat me to it. I think we should finish the process now if you feel the article is ready. Thanks! Basilisk4u (talk) 19:25, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Basilisk4u, the reason I would like to see the table updated with the award results is because the GA pass template includes a link to the version of the article when it was passed. I can't speak for others, but I personally will often check the approved version to see how it differs from the current version. And I just think it would look very odd to have that link permanently pointing to a table frozen in time which does not include the results. The awards are only a week away so we might as well wait for them now IMO.

Other than that, there is one other change I meant to mention earlier but didn't get around to, which is that I'd like you to tablify the discography section (ie the two albums). While not strictly speaking necessary for the GA, given that these are his main works, I think they need a better presentation than just a plain link.

Apologies once again for the delay in returning to this discussion, I've had quite a few distractions this week. Gatoclass (talk) 11:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

After being unable to return to this nomination due to real life work commitments and a crippling back injury which sidelined me for many months, it's quite a relief to be able to close this at last! Apart from a few ambiguities in the text and some sparse punctuation here and there, this was basically a well written and well presented article which didn't need a lot of work to get up to speed. Congrats on some fine work Basilisk4u, and my thanks once again for your patience! Gatoclass (talk) 05:35, 1 December 2020 (UTC)