Talk:Anontune

untitled

I'd like to respectfully dispute the accuracy of the previous wikipedia article for Anontune which seems to have been based almost entirely on secondary sources (media) rather than primary sources (anontune.) I am currently developing Anontune with other people and as such am in a good position to dispute the accuracy of this article. That is why I rewrote most of the article. Feel free to peruse the new article for any bias, I have tried my best to avoid it.

I suggest future versions of this article include a section for criticism/controversy, a look at the business model, and so forth. There is perhaps still much to write about which I don't have the time to do. If any wikipedians are interested in writing a better article I suggest reading the most recent white paper available at http://anontune.com/about/papers/ and or consult the development system http://dev.anontune.com/

Thanks for reading :) Anontune (talk) 02:05, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Are you guys freaking seriously attacking The Pirate Bay? B^e——C_ritical 14:53, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Well, we're personally not. I wasn't aware Anonymous were attacking the pirate bay but I imagine most people from Anonymous would support the pirate bay, particularly the activists. It may be someone from Anonymous are attacking the pirate bay but that doesn't imply we are.

By the way, it may be too early to include Anontune in Wikipedia. It hasn't yet achieved much social, technological or legal change. What do you think about this? Wer34k234ksdfodbguwe4fod (talk) 09:37, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Anontune. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120513163407/http://anontune.com/papers/Anontune_White_Paper_V2.pdf to http://anontune.com/papers/Anontune_White_Paper_V2.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120513163230/http://anontune.com/user/classical/ to http://anontune.com/user/classical/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120504005106/http://dev.anontune.com/ to http://dev.anontune.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120413150928/http://www.anontune.com:80/netjs/ to http://anontune.com/netjs
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120420235802/http://www.anontune.com/ to http://www.anontune.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:09, 15 October 2016 (UTC)