Talk:Anne E. Lazarus

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 March 2024. The result of the discussion was keep.

Anne E. Lazarus was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 24, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States courts and judges Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Unsuccessful. Mokadoshi (talk) 02:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Anne E. Lazarus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: DocZach (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Mokadoshi (talk · contribs) 02:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately, after comparing this article to the six good article criteria I have to quick-fail this nomination for the following reasons:

Failed good article nomination on March 24, 2024

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Upon its review on March 24, 2024, this good article nomination was quick-failed because:

it had a virtual or complete lack of reliable sources,

thus making it ineligible for good article consideration. According to Wikipedia:Verifiability, "Material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, must be attributed to a reliable, published source." The article relies significantly on primary or non-independent sources, which are not WP:RELIABLE for the good article criteria. Other sources, like Ballotpedia, have no consensus as to their reliability; having these in an article is fine, but an article has to also have reliable sources to become GA. Additionally, it wouldn't be possible to review this article as it is currently subject to a content dispute: it is currently nominated for deletion and consensus has not been reached yet as to the notability of the subject.

This article did not receive a thorough review, and may not meet other parts of the good article criteria. I encourage you to remedy this problem (and any others) and resubmit it for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a Good article reassessment. Thank you for your work so far. Mokadoshi (talk) 02:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic