Talk:Amy Wyatt/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ashliveslove (talk · contribs) 07:47, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

• Started the reviewing process. ASHU^IND 07:47, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Final Analysis

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Not much concerns here. ASHU^IND 07:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   No such concerns here. Article has been searched thoroughly for such references. ASHU^IND 07:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   All such aspects have been covered.ASHU^IND 07:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Fine here. ASHU^IND 07:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All images are proper till the review date and well captioned. ASHU^IND 07:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: