Talk:Ammonitoceras

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cephalopods, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CephalopodsWikipedia:WikiProject CephalopodsTemplate:WikiProject CephalopodsCephalopods articles

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

What, no reference?

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Surely between Mar. 2007 when attention was called to the fact the the article lacked any corroborating references and the latest edit in Mar 2013 someone would have come across one, even if only from the Paleobio database. Part L of the Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, 1957 has a description on page L211 and there are a number of websites, mostly French, that show pictures of the beast. If no one beats me do it I might get around to fixing the problem. And by the way, in general aspect Ammonitoceras looks more like a crioceratid to me, even though placed in the Ancyloceratidae J.H.McDonnell (talk) 01:35, 4 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic