Talk:Amanita rubrovolvata/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Rcej in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 07:11, 19 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nice! Two things:

  • In tax and phylo, layify sentence "The study, intended to clarify natural groups and phylogenetic relationships within the genus, used nuclear DNA sequences coding for a part of the ribosomal large subunit."
  • I layed it by chopping off the portion after the comma—it's unnecessary detail to understand the gist of the text, and the hardcore types can check out the cited reference. Sasata (talk) 05:11, 20 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pass! Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:02, 20 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Results of review

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Amanita rubrovolvata passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: Pass