Talk:Altes Stadthaus, Bonn/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 08:26, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Nice article. Here are a few issues:

• "It was mainly housed in the now-demolished section of the building.[8]" - it is?

• Yes. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 12:04, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

• I mean, "It" is what?--Kürbis (✔) 18:01, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

• I see,  Done. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 18:07, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

• Why is SPD and Cologne not linked?

• SPD is linked in the second paragraph in the History section.  Done Cologne. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 12:04, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

• "The report which was presented at the end of December recommended reuse of the already modified internal space housing the library, and creation of additional usable space up to a total of approximately 1600 m² by lowering the floor to street level and modifying stairway areas without changing the external appearance of the building, which is characteristic of government buildings of the 1920s, particularly in its blocky ground floor." - this sentence is very large--

•  Done Thine Antique Pen (talk) 12:04, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Kürbis (✔) 11:57, 6 October 2012 (UTC)