This tower has two observation levels which are not open to the public. Why? Have those sometime been open? If not, why they were built? High speed elevators indicate also that those were meant to be open to public. 82.141.75.168 (talk) 13:23, 27 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I doubt they are "observation decks" at all, as stated in the article. The only possibility is the one given above: they have been open in the past. There is no point in observation levels without public access, as such they are just "decks". 85.217.22.146 (talk) 03:43, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Earthquake Design: 10 on Richter Scale? edit

According to the article, the tower was built to withstand "earthquakes up to a strength of 10 on the richter scale" - without citation This seems very unlikely - the richter scale saturates at a much lower level (~Ml = 6.8) so wouldn't go up to 10. The moment magnitude scale (which has superseded the richter scale) has never recorded such an earthquake (so it would be designed to withstand an earthquake bigger than any recorded and possibly greater than is possible). Also, it is likely designed with a peak ground acceleration or other measure of intensity - factors such as distance from earthquake and ground conditions are very important in determining how intense an earthquake would be at a specific location. So unless someone has a citation for this claim, I suggest it be deleted. 188.221.161.189 (talk) 14:17, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:E8436-Almaty-TV-Tower.jpg Nominated for Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:E8436-Almaty-TV-Tower.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:E8436-Almaty-TV-Tower.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:59, 20 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Almaty Tower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:12, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:22, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Reply