Talk:All Saints Church, Patcham/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 19:52, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

I'll check over this soon; I don't mind if improvements may need a bit more than seven days to be made, but please don't make this review stretch past a month or so :) /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 19:52, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Y Well, everything's been addressed quickly and I've read through the article a few times now with nothing else popping up. I don't know anything about English churches but I'm going to pass this nomination as I do know the GA criteria :). Congrats and good work! /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 21:45, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Prose

• Decalogue is a dab page.

→Fixed by relinking to Ten Commandments. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!)

• Expand the lede a bit. The article is about 15,000 characters, so the MOS recommends 2–3 paragraphs. I'd say two is good because the recommendation is for 15k–30k.

→Have added another paragraph, while trying to avoid repetition. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 13:49, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

• The heading "The church today" should be just "Today" or "Current status" per WP:HEAD.

→"Current status" sounds good; amended accordingly. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 13:49, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

• For "... a survey in 1825 by Sir Stephen Glynn of the Ecclesiological Society noted that it was "decently fitted up"—[13] ..." the ref goes before the dash, per WP:REFPUN.

→Cool – never been sure about that one. Fixed, and I also linked Ecclesiological Society. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 20:05, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Sourcing

• Please order refs, i.e. "[10][6][20]" to "[6][10][20]".

→Think I've caught all of these now. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 13:49, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

• If possible, update ref 32 (closed churches) to this or a better page; the site seems to have been updated and the current link no longer works.

→Frustratingly, they have changed the URL yet again since December! This seems to have coincided with an October 2010 updated reissue of the report. New URL now added. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 13:49, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

•  Done Looks all good.

Coverage

•  Done Solid article.

Neutrality

•  Done No issues here.

Stability

•  Done This seems fine.

Images

• Just about all of the images are stacked on the right. Could a couple be moved to the left, so it doesn't look like a photo gallery on one side and a wall of text on the other side?

→A couple more are now left-aligned. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 22:40, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

• Adding alt text would be helpful. It currently appears that there is no alt text for most of the images in the article.

→Alt text now added for all images. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 22:40, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

•  Done All images are freely licensed, no non-free media to worry about, so this looks good.