Talk:Alexander Godley/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Dank in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dank (talk · contribs) 11:36, 24 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Zawed, I'll get to this today. - Dank (push to talk) 11:36, 24 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  • Check the 2nd and 3rd links in the toolbox (upper right on this page); one of the urls isn't working, and one isn't the best url to use. Home Guard is a disambig link. - Dank (push to talk) 13:48, 24 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
    • Hmm, wasn't aware of the url tool. Have fixed them and the dab link. Zawed (talk) 09:14, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "brevet": link it
  • "a posting in remote New Zealand may not enhance his reputation": wrong tense
  • "the somewhat amateur military establishment": "amateurish" might be appropriate, but only if the consensus is actually that harsh. What does McGibbon say?
    • Opted to remove the reference to amateur; it was supposed to refer to the military being partly based on volunteers at the time but in hindsight, the phrasing doesn't come off well. Zawed (talk) 09:14, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "he personally intervened to counter a potential Turkish counterattack": in what way?
  • "as well as the newly formed New Zealand Division": The sentence needs an "and" somewhere; you can substitute it for "as well as" if you like.
  • "frontline": front line (used as a noun)
  • "As well as an award of the French Croix de Guerre, he was appointed in 1918 ...": The introductory phrase dangles. "After receiving the French Croix de Guerre" would work (if it was in fact after)
  • "followed by an award of the Belgian Croix de guerre ...": This sentence needs an "and" somewhere.
  • "considered for as a possibility": ?
  • "Louise ... died in England. ... She lived in New Zealand": She had lived in New Zealand (and keep using past perfect until the sentence about the funeral).
  • "Godley offered his services to the New Zealand government but this was not taken up": ... government, but got no response.
    • Fixed as per your suggestion. Zawed (talk) 09:14, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • The references look good. The last two should be switched to be in alpha order.
    • <blushes at being caught out on his alphabet>. Fixed. Zawed (talk) 09:14, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "Major aspects" seem to be covered, but I'm not a good judge of that; I understand this is headed to A-class, which is a better place to make this call.
  • Otherwise:
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:   Yes
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:   Yes
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:   Yes
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:   Yes
    C. No original research:   Yes
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:   Yes
    B. Focused:   Yes
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:   Yes
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:   Yes
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:   Yes. Images are good.
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:   Yes
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Passed.
  • Dank, thanks for taking the time to review this article, your feedback is appreciated - I think I have to watch that "dangling". I think I have addressed all your comments as noted above. Thanks again. Zawed (talk) 09:14, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
    • Happy to help. Your edits check out, and I made one tweak. I'm going to look at a few other articles before signing off on "major aspects". - Dank (push to talk) 13:12, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Passed GA. - Dank (push to talk) 02:20, 27 February 2013 (UTC)Reply