Talk:Albatros L 72

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Which L.72? edit

The little, heavily staggered pusher flying boat described in the January 1926 Flight ref is clearly not the same machine as the subject of this article. Flight describes them both as L. 72 (well, strictly the transport is labelled L.72A) but I think they perhaps have mis-identified the flying boat, reg D-119, which other sources like HistAviation ("Albatros L.66".) and various registers (e.g. This) designate the L.71. C.f. the discussion on the Project page.TSRL (talk) 10:52, 6 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Coming back later there is clearly a naming division between the prewar and the modern sources. Prewar we have bothe French and Engish journals agreeing that the little flying boat was the L72 (Les ailes 72 and Flight 72. Both also agree that the transport was the 72A (or 72a) (Les ailes 72a and Flight 72A). Of the moderns, L71 is representative in calling the flying boat L71, even though their source calls it L.72 (see the 3-view, for example). Given the consistency in the prewar journals (two languages, two types) I'm now inclined to think the modern sources have been trying to avoid a naming conflict which Albatros sorted with the added A. The two aircraft ere close to each other in time and to the L73, which may have contributed to the? Mystery! Anyway, unless anyone objects, I'll move the 72 -> 72A. Worry about the 71 later!TSRL (talk) 16:01, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
For some reason I've called the L.71 or 72 a flying boat. It was a little sports plane with a conventional u/c!
Hmph! Just found this. The 71 and 72 sound like the same aircraft and most likely the German source trumps the "foreign" English and French journals.TSRL (talk) 17:07, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Albatros L 72. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:31, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Albatros L 72. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:12, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply