Talk:Albanian Orthography Congress
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[Untitled]
editMondiad, thanks for the article. A better reference for Myftaraj would be here, since Telegraf published his article, but you have the link to Myftaraj's blog. I don't like Myftaraj, as he is not entirely precise, and his tendentiousness is noted, but that's not much written about the Congress anyways, and, nevertheless Myftaraj is correct in most counts (although in not all of them).--MorenaReka (talk) 13:37, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
List of attendees
editWhere else on WP do we publish a list of the people who attended a conferences? This looks to me like undue emphasis. Please see WP:DIRECTORY I don't want to have to nominate the article for deletion, so unless you can justify it,I'm going to remove it. DGG ( talk ) 17:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- DGG, thanks for the input. This conference was pretty important, as it decided standard Albanian language grammar and orthography, as the fusion of two dialects (debatable if the outcome was 50/50 or pretty much 95/5 in favor of one dialect).
- The notability of the conference is unrelated to the list of the signatories that is present in the article.
- Still, I agree with you that because of WP:DIRECTORY we should not list all the signatories, even though the source, if you looked at it, analyzes all the signatories and their background (and its saying how more than 95% of them didn't have the credentials to make such important decisions.
- Perhaps what we should do is to put in a paragraph the people who are notable, and get rid of the list itself, but I eventually would keep a paragraph on the notable people who had a link in Wikipedia, source that paragraph, and be done with it.
- How does that sound? I hope Mondiad will agree with me as well. MorenaReka (talk) 23:17, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Fine. --Mondiad (talk) 23:53, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- You say that wholeheartedly Mondiad, or just because DGG is an admin and the other conferences don't have the participants? This conference was pretty important, and you worked a lot on that list. You can still follow WP:IAR, :-). --MorenaReka (talk) 23:57, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- We have other articles with the full list of participants, i.e. Albanian Congress of Trieste, or Congress of Durres. But there is no point of having all of them here after all, since there are people like schoolteachers without any notability who hardly will have an wikiarticle ever. I didn't know if DGG is an admin or not, whatever. But there is no point in arguing. Also the proportion of the full list is not compatible with the rest of the article. If we had more information on the process-verbals, what was said and who, that would be different. You can always add them back if you feel like. I would stand by your decision. --Mondiad (talk) 03:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- Well then great, we are all on the same page. --MorenaReka (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- We have other articles with the full list of participants, i.e. Albanian Congress of Trieste, or Congress of Durres. But there is no point of having all of them here after all, since there are people like schoolteachers without any notability who hardly will have an wikiarticle ever. I didn't know if DGG is an admin or not, whatever. But there is no point in arguing. Also the proportion of the full list is not compatible with the rest of the article. If we had more information on the process-verbals, what was said and who, that would be different. You can always add them back if you feel like. I would stand by your decision. --Mondiad (talk) 03:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- You say that wholeheartedly Mondiad, or just because DGG is an admin and the other conferences don't have the participants? This conference was pretty important, and you worked a lot on that list. You can still follow WP:IAR, :-). --MorenaReka (talk) 23:57, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Fine. --Mondiad (talk) 23:53, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Albanian Orthography Congress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130712020918/http://www.kastriotmyftaraj.com/?p=335 to http://www.kastriotmyftaraj.com/?p=335
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:10, 29 June 2017 (UTC)