Talk:Albania in the Eurovision Song Contest 2009/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 17:21, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I will take this on now while it is the most recent GAN under other music articles; will start either today or tomorrow! --K. Peake 17:21, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Infobox looks good!
• "of the Eurovision Song Contest," → "of the contest,"

Background

• Good

Before Eurovision

Festivali i Këngës

• Add the main article template at the top to wikilink Festivali i Këngës 47

Competing entries

• Target West Side Family to Dr. Flori and remove the wikilink on him under composer(s) in this context

Shows

Semi-finals

• "they performed a duet with other Albanian artists." → "each artist performed a duet with an other Albanian artist."
• Target West Side Family to Dr. Flori
• Target Getoar Selimi to Tingulli 3nt

Final

• Target West Side Family to Dr. Flori

At Eurovision

• Reword the img text to be of relevance to this article plus write her full name on the text
• Target second to Eurovision Song Contest 2009#Semi-final 2
• "for the 2009 contest" → "for the Eurovision Song Contest 2009"
• "of the 42 participating countries of the contest" → "of the 42 participating countries"

Voting

• "the nation finished in" → "Albania finished in"
• "including 10 awarded from" → "including 10 from"

Points awarded to Albania

• Good

Points awarded by Albania

• Good

Split voting results

• Good

References

• Copyvio score looks amazing at 13.8!!!
• Great job on archiving them all once again and there is no issues with the layout at all!

Final comments and verdict

•  On hold until all of the issues are fixed, hopefully this can be another article of yours that is passed in the same day as the review! --K. Peake 19:59, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Kyle Peake, thanks for another great review. I have done all your suggestions. Best regards!--Lorik17 (talk) 20:11, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Lorik17 ✓ Pass now, thanks to you straight back for a great response! --K. Peake 21:11, 22 January 2021 (UTC)