Talk:Al Thake/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 21:47, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Will review MWright96 (talk) 21:47, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Lead

edit
  • The term English doesn't necessarily need to be wikilinked
  • I think the lead could be expanded a little with more relevant career statistics

Early life

edit
  • Maybe wikilink baseball in this section since it is the first time the sport is mentioned in the prose?

Professional career

edit
  • "In 1871, the National Association became the first professional baseball league. Thake joined the league in 1872 as a left fielder for the Brooklyn Atlantics." - maybe both of these sentences can be merged together

Death

edit
  • "The New York Post reported that he was caught in fishing nets, while The New York Times reported that the current swept him away." - repetition of "reported"
  • Perhaps wikilink baseball fields
  • "On September 10, Thake's funeral was held at his mother's home. He was buried at Green-Wood Cemetery in Brooklyn." - these two sentences could be merged together

Career statistics and reputation

edit
  • "Baseball historian Frank Russo writes," - perhaps add the book Russo mentions Thake in

Putting the review on hold to allow the nominator to address or query the points raised above MWright96 (talk) 08:43, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply