 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is completely incomprehensible. Sorry, I don't have the knowledge to improve it. Just thought I'd let everyone know. 71.58.151.144
- It could certainly do with some development, I might have a look at it tonight, but more needs doing! 129.234.4.76 (talk) 13:03, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Still makes close to no sense, anyone care to elaborate? --82.27.236.224 (talk) 19:54, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
OK, I’ve had a go at expanding the discussion. I’ve rewritten the article from scratch as the concept is becoming quite important in a number of fields. I hope it makes better sense now. The section on Deleuze & Guattari still needs expanding, which I might tackle if I get the time. Deleuzians, please jump in and do it! Looking at the quality scale this now seems to fall most closely under the descriptors for B-Class article. GKantaris (talk) 21:36, 29 November 2011 (UTC)