Talk:Aero East Europe Sila
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Ahunt in topic Addition of Template: Aircraft manufacturers of Yugoslavia and Serbia and Category:Aircraft manufacturers of Yugoslavia and Serbia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aero East Europe Sila article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Addition of Template: Aircraft manufacturers of Yugoslavia and Serbia and Category:Aircraft manufacturers of Yugoslavia and Serbia
editThis article is about an aircraft type, the product of Aero East Europe, not about the company. This template and category do not belong on an article about the product, they belong on the article about the manufacturer, which is currently a redlink, meaning that the article has not been written yet. - Ahunt (talk) 02:21, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- You could be a little flexible here until we dont have enough material to create a parent article and a products one. For what it means this article is about the manufacturer of those planes so it should be treated as such. FkpCascais (talk) 02:45, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- It isn't about flexibility, it is just misleading. Readers will come to this article looking for information on the company and find that it is about a product they make instead. The best way to fix this is to write the company article. Let me see what I can do about that. - Ahunt (talk) 11:34, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Done at Aero East Europe. Categories and template moved, too. - Ahunt (talk) 12:08, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- Many thanks, you did a great work! FkpCascais (talk) 15:28, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- Glad that was helpful to you. Building the encyclopedia is always the best solution. Just a thought, but if you are near by the factory a photo of their building might make a good addition to the article. - Ahunt (talk) 01:18, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
- Many thanks, you did a great work! FkpCascais (talk) 15:28, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- It isn't about flexibility, it is just misleading. Readers will come to this article looking for information on the company and find that it is about a product they make instead. The best way to fix this is to write the company article. Let me see what I can do about that. - Ahunt (talk) 11:34, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
