Talk:Aeolian processes

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2405:201:9003:90CD:EC38:B501:5992:3CDE in topic Geography

COPYRIGHT WARNING edit

The first paragraph seems to be taken verbatim from: http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/deserts/eolian/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amnesta (talkcontribs) 03:01, 3 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Source material clearly in the public domain, such as the source in question, is proper to bring over to Wikipedia. The source is indicated in the References section, as is standard for Wikipedia. However, it should be improved with with an inline citation, and further edited for NPOV and encyclopedic style. -- Paleorthid (talk) 17:31, 16 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Mariner 9 edit

I changed the sentence on Mariner 9 to

"When the Mariner 9 spacecraft entered its orbit around Mars in 1971, a dust strom lasting one month covered the entire planet, thus delaying the task of photo-mapping the planet's surface."

since the former version was imho slightly misleading (i.e. "a Mariner 9 landing caused a global dust cover"). My source is: http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/past/mariner8-9.html --83.77.159.127 14:39, 15 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Photo: Wind-carved alcove in the Navajo Sandstone near Moab, Utah edit

 

I doubt this alcove was carved by wind. Leaflet (talk) 03:02, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Well, you can not say that other processes like ice and rain had NO impact, but, if you check out references like this and this, you can see similar shapes (not exactly the same, but similar) that are credited as wind eroded. Also, with the cave-like shape of this feature, it is hard to imagine water making a shape like that and NOT wind, because water erosion does not scallop and does not carve horizontally, it groves vertically as the water falls under gravity. Qfl247 (talk) 03:24, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
No, this is understood to be initally a weathering phenomena. Look up Paradise, chapter 7 "Taffoni and other rock basins" in Volume 4, of Treatise in Geomorphology (Elsevier). Wind may have been involved in removing some of the resulting weathered debris.--130.68.132.239 (talkcontribs) 19:08, 21 November 2013‎ (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Aeolian processes/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

* Needs inline citation, and further editing for NPOV and encyclopedic style. -- Paleorthid (talk) 17:31, 16 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Substituted at 01:09, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aeolian processes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sphinx as yardang edit

This notion is apparently attributed to Farouk El-Baz but is considered untenable: https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA12493796&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=01498711&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=nm_p_oweb I've removed it from the article in the absence of any other corroborating source. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 01:17, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Geography edit

Eolian process 2405:201:9003:90CD:EC38:B501:5992:3CDE (talk) 06:06, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Geography edit

Out wash plain 2405:201:9003:90CD:EC38:B501:5992:3CDE (talk) 06:07, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply