Talk:Absolute location

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Randomgurn in topic Merge suggestion

Source edit

I think we can do better than having Barron's AP coursebook as a source, or can't we? 121.130.76.122 (talk) 14:15, 20 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup edit

This article needs a complete cleanup, sources, and an article split, dividing it into Absolute location and Relative location. The style of writing in the Relative location doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards as well. --75.162.237.173 (talk) 01:19, 28 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merge suggestion edit

This article should included into the Location (geography) page. The notion of absolute location is false (see my comments above, plus "Teaching geography", Philip Gersmehl, page 60 - it's on Google Books), and besides there is no longer an article for relative location (which is a real concept). Randomgurn (talk) 11:06, 1 July 2009 (UTC) yea — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.131.194.225 (talk) 00:07, 23 August 2011 (UTC)Reply