Talk:A Whole Nother Story/GA1

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Cloudz679 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cloudz679 (talk · contribs) 17:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    there are basic errors in the prose
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    The article is not adequately referenced
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    the article was only created two days before its nomination
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    This article is not close to meeting the Good article criteria. Time should be taken to attribute the text to reliable sources, then improve the prose. A copy edit would be helpful following the work on the text, not before. Nominating the article for GA, two days after creating it, has not been a worthwhile exercise. Please spend time reading the criteria. C679 17:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)Reply