Talk:A Rugrats Passover/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by SuperFlash101 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: @harej 07:09, 7 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): See below.
    b (MoS): Some terms are linked twice: 1995 in television, some of the writers' names, and the Exodus to name a few.
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): Yes
    b (citations to reliable sources): Yes
    c (OR): No original research
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): The "Production" section seems lacking. Supposedly a different production method was used, but this is not elaborated upon.
  1. b (focused): Yes
  2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: Yes
  3. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.: No edit wars
  4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): Yes
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions): Is the picture of Moses really necessary?
  1. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: Pass


I have promoted the article. @harej 20:56, 7 November 2009 (UTC)Reply