Talk:A Hunka Hunka Burns in Love/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Matthew R Dunn in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Matthew RD 17:50, 4 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I shall be conducting the review. -- Matthew RD 17:50, 4 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Lets see how the article goes against the GA criteria:

  1. Well written: Fails at present. See notes below
  2. Factually accurate and verifiable: Duly cited throughout. Passed.
  3. Broad in coverage: No issues there. Passed.
  4. Neutral: No issues there either. Passed.
  5. Stable: No edit war over past few months. Passed.
  6. Images: All checks out fine. Non free image uses the right tags. "Excellent" (Passed)

Other than that, it was an "excellent" read. Just a few issues here and there. I will place it on hold until the issues are addressed. Good luck. -- Matthew RD 18:49, 4 March 2011 (UTC)Reply