Talk:A Dramatic Turn of Events/GA2

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Tomcat7 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tomcat7 (talk · contribs) 13:12, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

  • Add source after "You know, just to give you an idea of how deep this was to lose him, how difficult it was... after we got off the phone with him... I literally sat on the steps of my studio and cried. This is a guy who's a friend of mine, who we all love and admire. We didn't want to see it come crashing down."
    • This quote can actually be found in the article referenced in the sentence before it (Ref 2). Does that change anything, or should I still add it?
  • No spaced m-dashes, per WP:MDASH
  • "representing the band's first ever Grammy nomination." - could be referenced
  • Ref 54, better using the language= parameter
  • Dead links: 2, 39, 72, 73 [1]
  • Ref 70 may note that registration is required
  • [2] does not seem to be very reliable. The author is not an expert, but reviews albums rather as a hobby.--Tomcat (7) 13:31, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply