Talk:@icon sushi

Improvement

Juliancolton said here, that once notability is improved it can be brought to deletion review for inclusion. Can you help improve this? Thanks. --Hm2k (talk) 17:59, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

To be honest I'm not sure how the article can be sourced any better. There are already 8 reliable sources (which by the way is a bit ridiculous for a stub) and yet the article got deleted. I feel it has been deleted based only on vague user comments, failing to take into account that the article has been significantly improved during the Afd. In my opinion, the PC World, Softonic, and Windows Magazine reviews establish notability, while the 5 other sources show there is a "significant coverage". Perhaps we could just rewrite the article based on these sources, and include quotes from the reviews? Laurent (talk) 13:17, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

I asked Juliancolton for further assistance on this but there has been no follow up. I don't think a rewrite is required. I think notability is obvious enough. I see no reason why this article shouldn't be included. --Hm2k (talk) 16:03, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

I've submitted the deletion for review here: Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_August_21#21_August_2009. Laurent (talk) 13:57, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm pleased to see the outcome was positive. Thanks for the good work. --Hm2k (talk) 17:06, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on @icon sushi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090724081120/http://www.officialwindowsmagazine.com/4352741769176146053/create-your-own-icons.html to http://www.officialwindowsmagazine.com/4352741769176146053/create-your-own-icons.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:07, 30 September 2016 (UTC)