| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 5.6×39mm article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Dead link
editDuring several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.wolfammo.ru/site.xp/055053.html
- In .220 Russian on 2011-05-20 21:28:37, 404 Not Found
- In .220 Russian on 2011-05-31 04:42:50, 404 Not Found
Adopted by Finland???
editThe cartridge was not adopted by Finland but by Sako which was producing the cartridge. No official arm of the Finnish Government was using the cartridge if I am correct. This is analogous to clamming that the .220 Swift was adopted by the United States of America just because Winchester was producing it. DeusImperator (talk) 12:41, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah I'm wondering about this myself. Seems like much of the information here is from one site, https://hughesprecision.com/product-tag/220-russian/.
- The first reference says it was USED in Finland, which makes more sense. I removed the part about adopted by Finland and rewrote a good bit of the article using the sources from the bottom. Tengu99 (talk) 21:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)