Talk:41st Guards Rocket Division/GA1

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Krishna Chaitanya Velaga in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 00:47, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:47, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • Lead and infobox;
    • Link "68th Anti-Aircraft Artillery Division" "216th Rocket Brigade"; even if they are red links
  • The existence of those units is covered in the body and would be a self link if they were linked.Kges1901 (talk) 18:08, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
    • Intercontinental ballistic missiles from there; remove initial capital
    • Per MOS:FLAGICON, remove thumbnails and icons from the infobox
  • Section 1;
    • What is "RGK"? Never mentioned before
    • "AA" has to be defined in the braces on the first mention of "Anti-Aircraft"
    • and was commanded by -> under the command of
    • January and February 1945 -> January–February 1945
    • In February and March -> In February–March
    • 910 of its soldiers
    • two (Brusov and Andryushok) were made Heroes of the Soviet Union; also please be clear whether the above count includes these two as well or not
  • Section 2;
    • introduction of Intercontinental ballistic missiles; remove the initial capital, and link the entire phrase, you've missed the "s" in the ending
    • Colonel Konstantin Glushich; why a red link has been given to this, a colonel is notable.
  • Images OK, no plagiarism found.
Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:06, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:23, 19 November 2017 (UTC)Reply