Talk:23rd Battalion (Australia)/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by AustralianRupert in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk · contribs) 06:23, 1 December 2011 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

On hold

edit

Well done as normal, I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Jim Sweeney (talk) 17:49, 1 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Jim, thank you for taking the time to review this article. I think I've responded to everything. Let me know if there is anything else. It is Friday afternoon here, and for the first time in about six months, I have a weekend without work, so if you can get back to me today or tomorrow I can make anymore fixes you feel are necessary. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 07:27, 2 December 2011 (UTC)Reply