Talk:2018 Slovenian railway referendum
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled
editI do not think this should be a new article, but part of the original article on this matter, cause legally this is still the same referendum, only the voting will be repeated. The National Assembly (which is the only one that can call a referendum) was not asked to call a new referendum, in fact it did not have anything to do with this new voting. Only State Electoral Commission was asked to set a new date of voting.Sredina (talk) 22:24, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- We have separate articles on re-run elections, so I think it's appropriate to have separate ones here. Also, I couldn't think of how the article on the first vote could be renamed appropriately to cover both votes. Number 57 22:33, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
"Re-run elections" are new elections, if you talk about special elections (like in the US), and not repeated elections. I don't know why the title should be changed, it will be clear from the article itself that the vote was repeated. However referendums are still different than elections, so I don't think new article are necessary, but do as you wish, I am not really interested in editing it in any way.Sredina (talk) 10:42, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Were the Montenegrin presidential election of 2002, February 2003 and May 2003 of the same sort? We used separate pages for them.--Aréat (talk) 17:35, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- In fact they are, and should be in the same article (in my opinion).Sredina (talk) 22:14, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- I don't know, wouldn't that make it look like there were no vote on a given year when there actually were? I've been updating a good bunch of election templates, and many of them show the full date range when an election extend over two years, like the Bhutanese National Council election, 2007–2008. When we do that, it does mean we portray years in which a vote took place, and not the year in which a vote began. It seem more logical to me. --Aréat (talk) 23:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- In fact they are, and should be in the same article (in my opinion).Sredina (talk) 22:14, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Agree to merge this aarticle with the Slovenian railway referendum, 2017: it's actually the same referendm, with exactly the same question on the same topic. It could be considered like a normal election with a first round and a second round. --Holapaco77 (talk) 15:21, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
