Talk:2017 Kyrgyz presidential election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Kyrgyzstan Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kyrgyzstan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Kyrgyzstan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KyrgyzstanWikipedia:WikiProject KyrgyzstanTemplate:WikiProject KyrgyzstanKyrgyzstan articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Inaccurate assertion about OSCE monitoring edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The preliminary results sub-section contains the following:

Election monitors from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe gave a "generally positive" report of the election's fairness, but made note of concerns over "misuse of public resources, pressure on voters and vote buying".[3] They additionally commented that there were no particular incidents where violations took place.[40]

The reference for the second sentence is in Cyrillic and I can't read it; however, I can read the OSCE's statement that is being referred to, and there is no comment in it that says anything to the effect of that second sentence. I'm going to take it out, I just wanted to explain my rationale first in case this turns out to be contentious. A Train^talk 09:07, 17 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic