Talk:2016 24 Hours of Daytona/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 16:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• Hello MWright96, I'll be taking up the review for this nomination and will present it to you in some time. I hope you will find my feedback to be helpful. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 16:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

  MWright96, good work on the article, I've completed the review and could not find any significant issues. There are two minor ones which I have mentioned in the comments but otherwise this is more or less a good article so I've promoted it. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 13:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• "It was the third consecutive year it was part of the WeatherTech SportsCar Championship and the 54th 24 Hours of Daytona." This line should have an inline citation.
• Since the information in the image caption under "Entry list" is not present in the article, the caption itself should have an inline citation.

Assessment

1. Comprehension: The article is very well written.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (prose)	The prose is clear, concise and understandable.	Pass
(b) (MoS)	The article is compliant with the manual of style.	Pass

2. Verifiability:The article is verifiable.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (references)	The article has a list of references and inline citation in the body, some minor issues exist.	Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)	Sources used appear to be largely reliable.	Pass
(c) (original research)	No original research found.	Pass
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)	No copyright violation or plagiarism found, note earwig's brings a number of false positive due to the names.	Pass

3. Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive enough.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (major aspects)	The article has a broad coverage of all major aspects.	Pass
(b) (focused)	The article is focused without any unnecessary deviations.	Pass

4. Neutrality: The article is neutral.
Pass

Notes	Result
The article is compliant with the policy on neutral point of view.	Pass

5. Stability: The article is stable.
Pass

Notes	Result
No ongoing edit warring or content disputes exist.	Pass

6. Illustration: The article is well illustrated.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)	Images used are tagged with their appropriate copyright statuses.	Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)	Use and captions are appropriate and illustrative.	Pass