Talk:2015 Amstel Gold Race/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 10:48, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

I am on it. Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:48, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Very little wrong with this. The following should be taken care of:

• No citations needed in the lead. You can move the first two into the infobox, the third one is not needed since you give this info later in the text.
• Teams: Why did Devenyns and Degand not start?
• Route: Any chance you can give a comparison with the previous year's course?
• Pre-race favorites: The first two sentences seem not to fit. If Kreuziger attacked shortly after the last ascend of Cauberg, wasn't that very late in the race as well?
• 2nd paragraph: You should give Kreuziger's team, now it seems like he is with Wanty. You could also put Schumacher and Rebellin next to each other, that way you only need to give the team once.
• Report: was caught 8 kilometres (5.0 mi) later - the source says 7 km.
• Post-race: was his worst result since his victory in 2010 sounds a little weird. I think better would be "was his worst result since 2009"?
• UCI World standings: Even though you give the references in the prose, you should also add a source row to the table, just as you have for the race result.

That's about it, good work so far! :) It's on hold for 7 days. Zwerg Nase (talk) 17:19, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Many thanks, Zwerg Nase. All done now, I think. Relentlessly (talk) 21:16, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Done some minor fixes myself, but now it's done :) Congrats! Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:41, 6 August 2015 (UTC)