Talk:2013 FIVB Beach Volleyball World Tour
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Green-eyed girl in topic The Hague event (at least) has a corporate sponsor
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Opens are not part of the World Tour in 2013
editLinky linky link. So they should probably be removed from this page. Green-eyed girl (Talk · Contribs) 10:02, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, I did not notice this detail when I create the article, actually Opens no longer part of the World Tour. I left them in a specific section, but don't know if it would be better for that one article itself. What do you think? Jonas kam (talk) 05:34, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- Don't know. It's kind of a technicality, really, since the big teams will still play them (those in the midst of the season anyway). You could rename the article to exclude "world tour" from it, I suppose. They're still FIVB events, meaning they're above the continental circuits. Green-eyed girl (Talk · Contribs) 07:01, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- Maybe the best thing to do is to create an separate article (2013 beach volleyball season or 2013 in beach volleyball I really do not know, would be a original content here) where they would all results (Grand Slams, Opens, Continental Cups and others described here). "World Tour" is a traditional beach volleyball circuit, I think it should remain as a separate article. Jonas kam (talk) 08:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- A title like that would lend itself to including the continental circuits. Which I suppose you totally could. But anyway, do what you gotta do. I'm really just passing through. Green-eyed girl (Talk · Contribs) 22:33, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- Maybe the best thing to do is to create an separate article (2013 beach volleyball season or 2013 in beach volleyball I really do not know, would be a original content here) where they would all results (Grand Slams, Opens, Continental Cups and others described here). "World Tour" is a traditional beach volleyball circuit, I think it should remain as a separate article. Jonas kam (talk) 08:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
For the record, +1 !vote for the original layout scheme of the page
editIt's different from previous years, but it's better. It eliminates any stupidity over what the Brazilian players are called, for one, and gives more information without giving too much information, too. I support this reversion (though as the intervening edits were not unambiguous vandalism, I'm not sure a rollback was really the proper way of doing it, but that's splitting hairs). Green-eyed girl (Talk · Contribs) 22:40, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- I agree with you, I'm Brazilian but it is ridiculous lack of criteria with respect to the names of the players, some are known by first name, surname and others by a nickname! This is a general mess. For this reason I reverted because it made changes to the page without discussion, but in this case it might have been better to do manually, for sure. Jonas kam (talk) 01:19, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
The Hague event (at least) has a corporate sponsor
editThey're calling it the Transavia Grand Slam. Should we incorporate that name? Green-eyed girl (Talk · Contribs) 13:19, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Despite the FIVB refer the event as "The Hague Grand Slam" only, I'm not against using the sponsor name. :D Jonas kam (talk) 04:14, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- Well I'm not necessarily suggesting that we should nor should not. Just bringing it up. We should look at past precedents, existing policy, and so forth. Green-eyed girl (Talk · Contribs) 11:06, 16 June 2013 (UTC)