Talk:2001 Australian federal election
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Fleet Lists in topic Can this?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2001 Australian federal election article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of 2001 Australian federal election was copied or moved into Results of the 2001 Australian federal election (House of Representatives) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
80 Senate seats? edit
The total number of senate seats listed here is 80. Shouldn't it be 76? -- Chuq 05:57, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
The complication is caused by the Territory Senators. I will try to express it more clearly. Adam 06:05, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Can this? edit
Can this article remain on the page? --Celco85Celco85 (talk) 11:39, 12 March 2021 (UTC) https://theconversation.com/issues-that-swung-elections-tampa-and-the-national-security-election-of-2001-115143
- Two conditions - should be formatted correctly which it was not and the reason for its inclusion should be shown clearly which again it was not. Hence it was deleted. How many times have we now suggested that you should format references correctly?Fleet Lists (talk) 04:45, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- I have since again read the reference and I believe it is a good one but it must meet the two criteria above for it to be included in the article so that it does not reduce the quality of the article.Fleet Lists (talk) 05:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)