Talk:1984 Rajneeshee bioterror attack/GA1

Note: Also in talk archives, at Talk:1984_Rajneeshee_bioterror_attack/Archive_1#Successful_GA_nomination.

Confirmation of status for GA review

Hi, your delinquent GA reviewer here. Perhaps luckily for the article, I was occupied with other duties for too long a time to get to the review in an expedient fashion. I just want to confirm that the RFC truly is agreed to be finished, and that the article is stable enough for review. Please let me know, and I'll get to it right away. Regards, VanTucky ^talk 20:49, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

• Article is Stable -- There have been no edits to the article since November 27, so it's quite stable. As for the non-existent RFC, to clarify, yes, there was an issue, but I had voluntarily withdrawn the RFC, and changed the article text in-line with the other editor's suggestions, so that issue was resolved. Cirt (talk) 23:03, 12 December 2007 (UTC).

Successful GA nomination

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Needless to say, this is review long overdue. Accordingly, I'll keep it short and to the point.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

   Well done.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Far exceeds the minimum GA standard for inline citations.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Thanks for your patience, and congratulations! VanTucky ^talk 02:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)