Talk:1982 Benson & Hedges Cup final/GA1

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 18:13, 28 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Will review. MWright96 (talk) 18:13, 28 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Lead

edit

Background

edit

Route to the final

edit

Summary

edit

Aftermath

edit

References

edit

Those were the issues I found. On hold. MWright96 (talk) 09:49, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

@MWright96: Thanks for the review; I have responded to each point above. Harrias talk 10:15, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Harrias: Am happy with the changes and will promote to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 12:38, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply