Talk:1882 Navy Midshipmen football team/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 02:04, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   No pictures in article.

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

   No pictures in article.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 13:01, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Comments

• "However, even with the expansion, Princeton dominated the game, being declared the champion eight times in ten years." - Does ref 2 support this? Because the ref can't be accessed from a readers point of view, if ref 2 does indeed support this, place another footnote at the end of this sentence.--Dom497 (talk) 02:15, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

• Footnotes added after the sentence. It is now backed up by refs 2 and 3.

• For the table, call me stupid but I think some readers may not understand why the "Attendance" section is blank. Maybe add a note like you did for the location saying that the figure is not known?--Dom497 (talk) 02:15, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

• Endnote added.

That's all....great work! I will pass the article once these two points are addressed.--Dom497 (talk) 02:15, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

I've addressed your two concerns. Thanks for the review. - Awardgive. Help out with Project Fillmore County 05:02, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Good work; all comments addressed.--Dom497 (talk) 13:01, 20 June 2013 (UTC)