Talk:10th Intelligence Support Squadron

(Redirected from Talk:10th Intelligence Squadron)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Contradiction edit

The assignments of the 10th Intelligence Squadron in the lineage do not agree with the narrative. The reference for the lineage appears to by a factsheet for the 8th Intelligence Squadron a different unit. I believe this unit was assigned to the 67th Intelligence Group, then the 480th Intelligence Group until 1 Dec 2003 and is now assigned to the 497th Intelligence Group. --Lineagegeek (talk) 20:44, 30 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Jargon edit

The Mission section is full of Jargon and needs rewriting. --Lineagegeek (talk) 20:47, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 10th Intelligence Squadron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:47, 13 June 2017 (UTC)Reply