Talk:100-yard dash

Running Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Running, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of running on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RunningWikipedia:WikiProject RunningTemplate:WikiProject RunningRunning articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge tag all running related articles with {{WikiProject Running}} adding assessment and importance parameters when missing find references for articles listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Running/Unreferenced BLPs adopt an article and promote it to GA

Athletics Low‑importance

	Sport of athletics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

There is absolutely no need to talk about Ron Paul. It's wikispamming; he's not known for his athletics, bills on athletics, or national athletic policy.

R.P. Williams edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

How does one mark a reference as questionable. While I was able to find a blog mention of the "feat" of him running 9.0 [1], the person writing the blog was unnamed and gave reference to an out of print book "The Super Athletes" by David Willoughby, which I later tracked to being published in 1970. Further that: another reference to the book, commented on by Garry Hill, noted editor of Track and Field News responds "Willoughby's book, while a fascinating read about feats of strength, is, to say the least, largely the work of a guy given to wild flights of fantasy in comparing people across the ages. Very little science involved. Take it with many huge grains of salt." Later in the same blog, he cites the unbelievability of this one mark as substance for such a statement.

I have not stepped out on a limb to delete the item entirely, but certainly more documentation, beyond even Willoughby to his original sources sounds appropriate here.Trackinfo (talk) 19:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

i am wondering what the heights were of all the record breakers in the 100. If anyone knows let me know or a way to find out for a child's project.64.24.88.5 (talk) 02:01, 6 March 2010 (UTC) I was able to follow the links to the athletes. Several do have a listed height, Budd 5'10", Hayes 5'11" and McTear 5'7" Others might have data at IAAF.org, but I note John Carlos does not have a height listed (though I remember him on the tall side--that same memory remembered McTear as short).Trackinfo (talk) 07:54, 6 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic