Talk:1,5-Cyclooctadiene
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Jorge Stolfi in topic Maybe split articles?
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
COD or cod? edit
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:1,5-Cyclooctadiene/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| Considering IUPAC's provisional recommendations for ligand abbreviations, 1,5-Cyclooctadiene should be abbreviated cod rather than COD, see [1] GosseWeening (talk) 15:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC) |
Last edited at 15:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 05:43, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Like a dictionary, Wikipedia should generally follow common (but preferably non-jargon) word usage, rather than the nomenclature defined by any standards body like the IUPAC, prestigious as it may be. So, what is common usage in his case?--Jorge Stolfi (talk) 18:22, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Maybe split articles? edit
The bulk of the article seems specific to the cis-cis isomer. Perhaps cis-trans and trans-trans should be moved to their own artcles? --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 18:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)