Talk:Łódź insurrection/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Ajh1492 in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ajh1492 (talk) 16:44, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs some work before it becomes a Good Article.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- see below
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Review Completed
- Pass or Fail:
COMMENTS
So far I have the following comments. Ajh1492 (talk) 21:52, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
- Lede needs to be much more comprehensive wrt the article subject
- Move the references out of the Lede into the appropriate section of the article
- Isn't there an appropriate insurrection infobox template?
- How did the Russo-Japanese War damage the economy of the Kingdom of Poland? Was it from the war itself or the peace that Teddy R. negotiated? [replied below]
- Do you have a reference for "In the 19th century, Łódź had been a major Polish industrial center, heavily urbanized and industrialized, and a stronghold of the socialist movement."?
- need lang-pl tag on "endecja"
- Do you have any more detail on the murder of Jerzy Grabczyński any why it is considered a potential flashpoint? [replied below]
- The picture caption states Anarcho-Communists, any relation to the Chernoe-Znamia groups founded in Bialystok in 1903? [will look into]
- What was the affect on the relationship between Piłsudski's PPS and those loyal to Dmowski? [will look into]
- I may be a bit busy for the next week or two, I'll try to address those issues as soon as I can. Thanks! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 23:29, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
- I'm in no hurry to close the review. I'll keep looking through it and post any other things I see. Ajh1492 (talk) 17:13, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
- I'll look into various issues; but I don't think that the effect of the RJW on Polish economy is important enough to be discussed in this article on any detail. In the larger Revolution in the Kingdom of Poland (1905–1907), article, yes. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 22:12, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- It was a question in my mind since you made reference to it. Would you consider this article as a "child" of Revolution in the Kingdom of Poland (1905–1907) Ajh1492 (talk) 03:08, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
- Quite so (like a battle is child to a war article). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 07:18, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
- It was a question in my mind since you made reference to it. Would you consider this article as a "child" of Revolution in the Kingdom of Poland (1905–1907) Ajh1492 (talk) 03:08, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
- I'll look into various issues; but I don't think that the effect of the RJW on Polish economy is important enough to be discussed in this article on any detail. In the larger Revolution in the Kingdom of Poland (1905–1907), article, yes. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 22:12, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- Regarding Jerzy Grabczyński, I don't see anything else of any significance in the sources I can find.
- Regarding Chernoe-Znamia, there were many groups like that in Poland and really, Europe. We need to improve an article on the anarchism in Poland.
- The sources don't really discuss the effect on local groups, but their relation likely deteriorated. This is something better discussed at JP/RD/PPS/ND articles. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 18:54, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- I made some slight modifications with the images, added some links and other tweaks. Otherwise it's "Good". Ajh1492 (talk) 21:07, 29 June 2011 (UTC)