Talk:Þorgerðr Hölgabrúðr and Irpa/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   The only concern is the forced image size; I have removed the size tags—the reasoning for this is given in MoS.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Straight through a good article; I find nothing to point my finger at. Arsenikk ^(talk) 14:34, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Excellent, thanks! :bloodofox: (talk) 18:13, 2 July 2008 (UTC)