Slop (clothing)

(Redirected from Slop chest)

In 16th to 19th century Europe and North America, the slop trade was the manufacture and sale of slop, cheap ready-made clothing that was made by slop-workers and sold in slop-shops by slop-sellers.[1][2][3][4]

Slop

edit

The name "slop" was originally naval slang for the cheap ready-made clothing that a naval rating would purchase in lieu of an official uniform (which ratings in the British Royal Navy, at least, did not have until 1857) sometimes from a "slop chest" maintained on board ship by the purser.[5]

The trade

edit

The trade originated in government purchases of uniforms for soldiers and sailors; said uniforms being standardized and mass-produced rather than tailored to individuals, made to official specifications with rules about materials and shapes.[5] The rise in the slop trade was particularly spurred on by wartime orders for military clothing, such as during the Nine Years War and the War of the Spanish Succession.[5]

The slop trade was flourishing by the 18th century, as slop-sellers realized that they could sell to the general public as well as to the army and navy, and also received a boost from the Napoleonic Wars.[6][7][8] Slop work became organized into a system of large clothing warehouses subcontracting out to small workshops or individuals.[9][10] In the 19th century, however, "slop" was to gain a negative connotation, because of an economic conflict with the older bespoke tailoring industry.[6]

In the U.K. the rise of industrialization led to a growing workforce of largely female slop-worker labour, working on piecework, paid by the item, from home, which grew to outnumber the largely male workforce of craft tailors who in contrast worked in a master tailor's workshop and were paid by time worked.[6][8] In 1824 the ratio of the former to the latter in London was 4:1, but by 1849 it was 3:20.[8] The gender disparity had been created by exclusionary practices in the craft tailoring trade in the late 18th and early 19th century, as male tailors sought to exclude women.[8]

Similar factors were at work elsewhere; such as in Baltimore in the United States, where large tailoring enterprises such as Thomas Sheppard and Nathaniel Childs took to styling themselves "tailor and slop seller".[11] An increasingly female population with a growing number of female household heads provided a ready workforce of cheaper lesser-skilled female labour.[11]

In London, cheap ready-made clothing gained a wider market through increased middle-class and working-class incomes in the latter part of the century,[12][13] and a succession of strikes organized by tailors unions (in 1827, 1830, and 1834) largely failed.[8] The women slop-workers were seen as, and sometimes used as, strike-breakers, particularly in the London Tailors' Union strike of 1834 (which sought better wages, shorter hours, and a prohibition of the piecework and homework that slop-work involved);[14][8] and contemporary commentators (such as Henry Mayhew who interviewed clothes sellers and Charles Kingsley in both his Cheap Clothes and Nasty and Alton Locke, Tailor and Poet) painted the traditional tailoring trade's view of the situation as the "honourable" traditional tradesmen (also known as "Flints") versus the "dishonourable" slop-workers (named "Dungs") who worked in sweat-shops, and the de-skilling of what was once skilled labour.[6][14][8][15]

The clothing, also, was criticized for its poor quality, especially those slops that were made of shoddy, and for its exploitation of mainly the low-skilled women workers in the industry whose jobs involved minute parts of the overall process of the production of the clothes.[16]

See also

edit

Parramatta cloth was one type of slop cloth made of woolen, and there were flax linen cloths for convict clothing that women convicts made at the Parramatta Female Factory.[17]

Cross-reference

edit
  1. ^ Alden 1892, SLOP.
  2. ^ "Definition of SLOPSELLER". www.merriam-webster.com. Retrieved 2021-05-20.
  3. ^ Company, Cassell & (1884). German Pronouncing Dictionary in Two Parts: German-English, English-German: With an Appendix, Containing the Most Important Changes Introduced Into German Orthography in the Year 1880 by the Prussian Minister of Education. Cassell. p. 460. {{cite book}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  4. ^ Latham, Robert Gordon (1876). "A" Dictionary of the English Language: Founded on that of Samuel Johnson as Edited by H. J. Todd ; with Numerous Emendations and Additions ; in Two Volumes. RELU - ZYMO. Longmans, Green, & Company. p. 955.
  5. ^ a b c Toplis 2015, p. 6.
  6. ^ a b c d Toplis 2015, p. 7.
  7. ^ Honeyman 2000, p. 10.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g Burnette 2008, p. 268.
  9. ^ Honeyman 2000, pp. 10–11.
  10. ^ Steffen 1984, pp. 44–45.
  11. ^ a b Steffen 1984, p. 45.
  12. ^ Green 1995, p. 160.
  13. ^ Toplis 2015, pp. 7–8.
  14. ^ a b Honeyman 2000, p. 11.
  15. ^ TNBR 1851, p. 408.
  16. ^ Toplis 2015, p. 8.
  17. ^ fionas (2017-07-13). "'Slop' clothing". Sydney Living Museums. Retrieved 2021-05-25.

Sources

edit
  • Toplis, Alison (2015). The Clothing Trade in Provincial England, 1800–1850. Perspectives in Economic and Social History. Routledge. ISBN 9781317323051.
  • Honeyman, Katrina (2000). Well Suited: A History of the Leeds Clothing Industry, 1850–1990. Pasold studies in textile history. Vol. 11. Pasold Research Fund. ISBN 9780199202379.
  • Burnette, Joyce (2008). Gender, Work and Wages in Industrial Revolution Britain. Cambridge Studies in Economic History. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781139470582.
  • Alden, John Berry (1892). Alden's Manifold Cyclopedia of Knowledge and Language. Vol. 34. New York: The Columbia Publishing Company.
  • Steffen, Charles G. (1984). The Mechanics of Baltimore: Workers and Politics in the Age of Revolution, 1763–1812. Working class in American history. University of Illinois Press. ISBN 9780252010880.
  • Green, David R. (1995). From Artisans to Paupers: Economic Change and Poverty in London, 1790–1870. Scolar Press. ISBN 9781859280331.
  • "London Labour and the London Poor by Henry Mayhew". The North British Review. Vol. 14. Edinburgh: W. P. Kennedy. 1851.