The siege of Parenda (1634) was a 17th-century military conflict between the Mughal Empire and the Adil Shahi dynasty of the Bijapur Sultanate over Parenda Fort, wherein Mughal forces besieged the Adil Shahi fort for four months. The siege took place during the reigns of Mughal emperor Shah Jahan and Bijapur Sultan Muhammad Adil Shah. It was the second Mughal siege of the fort following a failed attempt in 1631, and was part of a string of Mughal military campaigns in the Western Deccan. The siege was led by Mughal general Mahabat Khan, governor of the Deccan, though the young prince Shah Shuja was its nominal commander. The siege lasted four months and was unsuccessful, with the fort remaining in Adil Shahi control.
| Siege of Parenda | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Belligerents | |||||||
| Mughal Empire |
Bijapur Sultanate Ahmadnagar Sultanate | ||||||
| Commanders and leaders | |||||||
|
Shah Shuja Mahabat Khan Khan Zaman Jai Singh I |
Murari Pandit Ranadulla Khan[1] Shahaji[1] | ||||||
Background
editThe siege of Parenda occurred at a time when the Mughals under emperor Shah Jahan had been steadily attacking forts in the territory of the Ahmadnagar Sultanate, of which the sieges of Qandahar, Dharur, and Daulatabad are examples. At this time, Muhammad Adil Shah ruled over the Bijapur Sultanate.[2][3] The fort of Parenda had been under the control of the Nizam Shahi dynasty of the Ahmadnagar Sultanate, until a governor sold the fort to the Adil Shahi sultan.[4] In 1631, the Mughals had tried to besiege the fort under the command of Azam Khan, but this endeavor failed due to a lack of adequate resources for supporting the imperial army.[5][6] The viceroy of the Deccan[7] Mahabat Khan thereafter advised the young Mughal prince Shah Shuja to consider another offensive against the fort of Parenda, as a means to consolidating authority over the outer territories of the Ahmadnagar Sultanate; the sultanate had just been symbolically defeated with Mahabat Khan's successful siege of Daulatabad (1633). Another provided justification was that Parenda could serve as a military base to campaign against the Bijapur Sultanate;[6] the fort had great strategic importance as there was no other fortified position between Parenda and the Sultanate's capital city of Bijapur.[2]
Mahabat Khan deputed expeditions led by his son Khan Zaman in the frontier of the Bijapur Sultanate. The latter also worked to establish military outposts spanning the line between Daulatabad and Parenda, so as to block off any Maratha forces. However, Shahji Bhonsle raised a puppet ruler to the Nizam Shahi throne and harassed the Mughal forces, which eased the pressure on Parenda and required that a Mughal force be deputed to deal with Shahji. This thwarted Khan Zaman's attempt to capture Parenda.[6]
Siege
editIn response to Khan Zaman's failed attempt, Mahabat Khan himself and prince Shah Shuja left the Mughal base at Malkapur, and marched to Parenda with a large army to besiege the fort personally, dating to 24 February 1634.[7][6] Shah Shuja was the nominal commander of the army, with Mahabat Khan his right-hand man. Rajput noble Jai Singh I acted as the force's vanguard, arriving in the vicinity of Parenda in January. He later led a night surprise attack on the enemy's baggage camp on the 14th of March.[5] Due to the lingering effects of the Deccan famine of 1630–1632, resources to support the imperial army such as grass and firewood were scarce in the area, which posed a challenge to the Mughal forces; foraging expeditions had to be sent to distant areas where they were more vulnerable to attacks. Mahabat Khan himself was nearly captured on one such expedition, before being rescued by Nasiri Khan.[6] The Adil Shahi commander Murari Pandit and Ranadulla Khan with Nizamshahi Commandar Shahaji[1]supported the fort with an armed force, which deterred Mughal efforts.[7] The imperial army was also poorly organised, and Shah Shuja was not able to effectively control his generals. In light of the fact that seasonal rains were due, Mahabat Khan advised Shah Shuja to retreat to Burhanpur; the siege was lifted in May of the same year,[6][5] having lasted four months.[1][8]
The siege of Parenda was closely monitored by the Portuguese State of India, likely due to the strategic importance of the fort.[2]
Aftermath
editAccording to scholar Douglas Streusand, the failed siege had an adverse impact on the area surrounding the fort; approximately 1,256 square miles were depleted of food, and 5,017 square miles were depleted of fodder.[8] Parenda Fort remained in Bijapur's hands and fell to Mughal control much later, only through bribery during the reign of Mughal emperor Aurangzeb.[4] Disappointed by the failure of the siege, Shah Jahan recalled Shah Shuja and Khan Zaman to the imperial court, and reprimanded Mahabat Khan; Mahabat Khan died shortly after in October 1634 from natural causes.[6] Some court chronicles of Shah Jahan's reign, though not all, omit mention of the Parenda siege, indicating that Shah Jahan wished to overlook this military failure.[2]
References
edit- ^ a b c d Gajanan Bhaskar Mehendale. Shivaji His Life & Times. pp. 207–208.
- ^ a b c d Flores, Jorge (15 October 2024). Empire of Contingency: How Portugal Entered the Indo-Persian World. University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 99–102. ISBN 978-1-5128-2645-6.
- ^ Streusand, Douglas E. (2011). Islamic gunpowder empires: Ottomans, Safavids, and Mughals. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press. p. 228. ISBN 978-0-8133-1359-7.
- ^ a b Yazdani, Ghulam (1926). Annual Report of the Archaeological Department of His Exalted Highness The Nizam's Dominions (PDF). Baptist Mission Press. pp. 17–18.
- ^ a b c Sarkar, Jadunath (1984). A History of Jaipur: C. 1503-1938. Orient Blackswan. pp. 102–103. ISBN 978-81-250-0333-5.
- ^ a b c d e f g The Cambridge History of India. CUP Archive. 1955. pp. 193–194.
- ^ a b c Chatterjee, Ramananda (1917). The Modern Review. Prabasi Press Private, Limited. p. 252.
- ^ a b Streusand, Douglas E. (2011). Islamic gunpowder empires: Ottomans, Safavids, and Mughals. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press. p. 285. ISBN 978-0-8133-1359-7.