Schauder estimates

In mathematics, the Schauder estimates are a collection of results due to Juliusz Schauder (1934, 1937) concerning the regularity of solutions to linear, uniformly elliptic partial differential equations. The estimates say that when the equation has appropriately smooth terms and appropriately smooth solutions, then the Hölder norm of the solution can be controlled in terms of the Hölder norms for the coefficient and source terms. Since these estimates assume by hypothesis the existence of a solution, they are called a priori estimates.

There is both an interior result, giving a Hölder condition for the solution in interior domains away from the boundary, and a boundary result, giving the Hölder condition for the solution in the entire domain. The former bound depends only on the spatial dimension, the equation, and the distance to the boundary; the latter depends on the smoothness of the boundary as well.

The Schauder estimates are a necessary precondition to using the method of continuity to proving the existence and regularity of solutions to the Dirichlet problem for elliptic PDEs. This result says that when the coefficients of the equation and the nature of the boundary conditions are sufficiently smooth, there is a smooth classical solution to the PDE.


The Schauder estimates are given in terms of weighted Hölder norms; the notation will follow that given in the text of D. Gilbarg and Neil Trudinger (1983).

The supremum norm of a continuous function   is given by


For a function which is Hölder continuous with exponent  , that is to say,   the usual Hölder seminorm is given by


The sum of the two is the full Hölder norm of f


For differentiable functions u, it is necessary to consider the higher order norms, involving derivatives. The norm in the space of functions with k continuous derivatives,  , is given by


where   ranges over all multi-indices of appropriate orders. For functions with kth order derivatives which are Holder continuous with exponent  , the appropriate semi-norm is given by


which gives a full norm of


For the interior estimates, the norms are weighted by the distance to the boundary


raised to the same power as the derivative, and the seminorms are weighted by


raised to the appropriate power. The resulting weighted interior norm for a function is given by


It is occasionally necessary to add "extra" powers of the weight, denoted by



The formulations in this section are taken from the text of D. Gilbarg and Neil Trudinger (1983).

Interior estimatesEdit

Consider a bounded solution   on the domain   to the elliptic, second order partial differential equation


where the source term satisfies  . If there exists a constant   such that the   are strictly elliptic,

  for all  

and the relevant norms coefficients are all bounded by another constant  


Then the weighted   norm of u is controlled by the supremum of u and the Holder norm of f:


Boundary estimatesEdit

Let   be a   domain (that is to say, about any point on the boundary of the domain the boundary surface can be realized, after an appropriate rotation of coordinates, as a   function), with Dirichlet boundary data that coincides with a function   which is also at least  . Then subject to analogous conditions on the coefficients as in the case of the interior estimate, the unweighted Holder norm of u is controlled by the unweighted norms of the source term, the boundary data, and the supremum norm of u:


When the solution u satisfies the maximum principle, the first term on the right hand side can be dropped.


  • Gilbarg, D.; Trudinger, Neil (1983), Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order, New York: Springer, ISBN 3-540-41160-7
  • Schauder, Juliusz (1934), "Über lineare elliptische Differentialgleichungen zweiter Ordnung", Mathematische Zeitschrift (in German), Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 38 (1), pp. 257–282, doi:10.1007/BF01170635 MR1545448
  • Schauder, Juliusz (1937), "Numerische Abschätzungen in elliptischen linearen Differentialgleichungen" (PDF), Studia Mathematica (in German), Lwów, Poland: Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Matematyczny, 5, pp. 34–42

Further readingEdit