San Francisco Bay Project edit
Under the plan, which was also known as the San Francisco Bay Project, the mouth of the Sacramento River (from Suisun Bay) would be channelized by dams and would feed two vast freshwater lakes within the bay, providing drinking and irrigation water to the residents and farmers of the Bay Area. The barriers would support rail and highway traffic and would create the two freshwater lakes. Between the lakes, Reber proposed the reclamation of 20,000 acres (81 km2) of land that would be crossed by a freshwater channel. West of the channel would be airports, a naval base, and a pair of locks comparable in size to those of the Panama Canal. Industrial plants would be developed on the east.
There are a great many difficulties to be surmounted, just as there were for the Bay and Golden Gate bridges, but they can be surmounted by application of the same kind of drive and technical know-how that brought the present great spans into being.
Feasibility tested edit
In 1946, the Alameda County Committee for a Second Bay Crossing and noted civil engineer Glenn B. Woodruff estimated the plan would cost $2.5 billion, more than 10 times Reber's estimate. Woodruff, who had helped design the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, blamed a misunderstanding of the geology of the bay for the massive discrepancy.
In 1953 the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers recommended more detailed study of the plan and eventually constructed a hydraulic model of the Bay Area to test it. The barriers, which were the plan's essential element, failed to survive this critical study. The scrapping of the Reber Plan in the early 1960s was one sign, perhaps, of the end of an era of grandiose civil works projects aimed at totally restructuring a region's natural environment, and the birth of the environmental era.
See also edit
- Moffitt, Mike (2021-04-22). "The spectacularly doomed plan to fill the San Francisco bay with a 36-lane freeway". San Francisco Chronicle.
- "Bridging the Bay, Bridging the Campus: Salt Water Barriers". UC Berkeley Library. Retrieved 2006-08-21.
- unsigned editorial (August 17, 1946). "Causeway to the Future". The San Francisco Chronicle.
- Hope, Dave (August 14, 1946). "Board hears Objections to Crossing Plan". Oakland Tribune. pp. 1–2. Retrieved November 5, 2023.
- "The Man Who Helped Save the Bay by Trying to Destroy It". 15 April 2015.
- California State Assembly, First Report of the Interim Fact-Finding Committee on Tideland Reclamation and Development in Northern California, Related to Traffic Problem and Relief of Congestion on Transbay Crossings (Sacramento, 1949), 23–25, 27
- John L. Savage, Report on Development of the San Francisco Bay Region (San Francisco, 1951), 1–2, 24–78
- W. Turrentine Jackson and Alan M. Paterson, The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta: The Evolution and Implementation of Water Policy (Davis: California Water Resources Center, 1977), 63–65.
- https://psmag.com/environment/the-fitness-of-physical-models-38084 December 5, 2011 The Fitness of Physical Models
- "Debate Site New Bridge Across Bay". Madera Tribune. August 13, 1946. Retrieved 2 July 2019.
- "Reber Plan Is Offered To Solve Bridge, Fresh Water Problems Of S. F. Bay Area". Sausalito News. October 16, 1947. Retrieved 2 July 2019.