R v Smith (1992)

R v Smith, [1992] 2 SCR 915 is a leading decision on hearsay by the Supreme Court of Canada. This decision, along with R v Khan (1990), began what is called the "hearsay revolution", supplementing the traditional categorical approach to hearsay exceptions with a new "principled approach" based on reliability and necessity of testimony.

R v Smith
Supreme Court of Canada
Hearing: June 15, 1992 Judgment: August 27, 1992
Full case name	Her Majesty The Queen v Arthur Larry Smith
Citations	[1992] 2 SCR 915
Docket No.	22281
Court membership
Chief Justice: Antonio Lamer Puisne Justices: Gérard La Forest, Claire L'Heureux-Dubé, John Sopinka, Charles Gonthier, Peter Cory, Beverley McLachlin, William Stevenson, Frank Iacobucci
Reasons given
Unanimous reasons by	Lamer CJ

Background

Arthur Larry Smith was accused of killing Aritha Monalisa King. It was believed they had both traveled from Detroit to London, Ontario. While in Canada, Smith had asked King to smuggle drugs back for him. She refused and was killed by Smith. At trial, King's mother testified she received four phone calls from her daughter the night of her death. The last call came from near where her body was found. King had told her mother she would be home very soon.

The issue before the Supreme Court was whether the statements could be admissible as evidence. The trial judge admitted the evidence and Smith was convicted. On appeal, the Court of Appeal for Ontario ordered a new trial.

Judgment

Lamer CJ, writing for the Court, dismissed the appeal. His reasons focused on the "principled approach" first developed in Khan. He found that the new approach was not just limited to child testimony but rather was a new method that applied to all hearsay statements, calling it a "triumph of a principled analysis over a set of ossified judicially created categories".

See also

• List of Supreme Court of Canada cases
• R v Starr
• R v Khelawon (2006)

External links

• Full text of Supreme Court of Canada decision at LexUM and CanLII