This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. (August 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
|Noel S. Hush|
Noel Hush in 2006.
|Born||December 15, 1924|
|Nationality||Dual Australian and British|
|Known for||electron transfer, molecular electronics, finite-field response|
|Awards||Fellow of the Royal Society of London (FRS) (1988)|
Ahmed Zewail Prize for Molecular Science (2014)
|Fields||theoretical chemistry, chemical physics|
|Institutions||University of Manchester, University of Bristol, University of Sydney|
|Thesis||The electronic spectrum of pentacene in five states of ionization: theory and experiment|
|Doctoral advisors||(D.Sc. 1959) H.C. Longuet-Higgins FRS and M.H.L. Pyrce FRS|
Hush was born in Sydney on 15 December 1924 and obtained his degrees (BSc Hons (1945) and MSc (1948)) at the University of Sydney, where he worked as a Research Fellow in the Department of Chemistry (1945–49). He then accepted an invitation from M. G. Evans FRS to work in England as an Assistant Lecturer at the University of Manchester (1950–54) in the department created by Michael Polanyi. He was subsequently Lecturer and then Reader in the Department of Chemistry at the University of Bristol (1955–71).
He then returned to Australia in 1971 to found The Department of Theoretical Chemistry at the University of Sydney, the first such department in Australia. This rapidly became established as a centre for excellence in teaching, from undergraduate to postdoctoral level, and research. In 1989 he became Emeritus Professor engaged in full-time research. He has also held numerous prestigious visiting scientist positions at universities in Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States of America.
Adiabatic Electron TransferEdit
A unifying theme of Hush’s research is elucidation of chemical electron transfer. This is the basis of oxidation-reduction processes, which are ubiquitous in Nature in both the inorganic and biological spheres. The mechanism of these reactions - the simplest of which proceed without making or breaking chemical bonds - remained unknown until the mid nineteen-fifties, when several independent theoretical studies showed that it was due to modulation of coupling between electronic and vibrational motions. According to his Royal Society election citation, Hush’s research in the area of homogeneous and heterogeneous electron transfer showed that electron transfer occurring during a collision between a molecule and either another molecule or else an electrode surface occurs adiabatically on a continuous potential-energy surface, and that electron transfer can occur by either optical or thermal mechanisms with the corresponding rates being closely connected.
Figure 1 sketches the basic elements of adiabatic electron-transfer theory. Two chemical species (ions, molecules, polymers, protein cofactors, etc.) labelled D (for “donor”) and A (for “acceptor”) become a distance R apart, either through collisions, covalent bonding, location in a material, protein or polymer structure, etc. These species have different chemical bonding environments and they polarize any surrounding condensed media. A key feature is that both species must be able to sustain different charge (valence) states. Electron-transfer theories specify equations describing the rate of charge transfer processes that utilize these different charged states. All electrochemical reactions occur by this mechanism. Adiabatic electron-transfer theory stresses that intricately coupled to such charge transfer is the ability of any D-A system to absorb or emit light. Hence fundamental understanding of any electrochemical process demands simultaneous understanding of the optical processes that the system can undergo.
Figure 2 sketches what happens if light is absorbed by just one of the chemical species, taken to be the charge donor. This produces an excited state of the donor. As the donor and acceptor are close to each other and surrounding matter, they experience a coupling . If the free energy change is favorable, this coupling facilitates primary charge separation to produce D+-A− , producing charged species. In this way, solar energy is captured and converted to electrical energy. This process is typical of natural photosynthesis as well as modern organic photovoltaic and artificial photosynthesis solar-energy capture devices. The inverse of this process is also used to make organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs).
Unifying standard electrochemical electron-transfer processes with this type of solar energy harvesting, adiabatic electron-transfer theory also depicts a third application in which the donor and acceptor are both involved in light absorption, as sketched in Figure 3. Here, light absorption directly leads to charge separation D+-A− . Hush’s theory for this process considers the donor-acceptor coupling , the energy required to rearrange the atoms from their initial geometry to the preferred local geometry and environment polarization of the charge-separated state, and the energy change associated with charge separation. In the weak-coupling limit ( ), Hush showed that the rate of light absorption (and hence charge separation) is given from the Einstein equation by
- … (1)
Hush’s theory also provides theoretical underpinning for the Robin-Day classification system for mixed-valence systems. Mixed valence is widespread in chemistry, from superconductors to minerals, magnetic molecular clusters and enzymes. It occurs when the same chemical species is found in two formally different oxidation states in the same system.
The synthesis of the mixed-valence Creutz-Taube ion, an event leading significantly to the award of the 1983 Nobel Prize in Chemistry to Henry Taube, demonstrated the successfulness of adiabatic electron-transfer theory. In this molecule, the coupling is not small, delivering unprecedented chemical phenomena in which charge is not localized on just one chemical species but is shared quantum mechanically between two, presenting classically forbidden half-integral valence states. Hush showed that the critical requirement for this phenomenon is
- … (2)
Adiabatic electron-transfer theory stems from London’s approach to charge-transfer and indeed general chemical reactions applied by Hush using parabolic potential-energy surfaces. Hush himself has carried out many theoretical and experimental studies of mixed valence complexes and long range electron transfer in biological systems. Hush’s quantum-electronic adiabatic approach to electron transfer was unique; directly connecting with the Quantum Chemistry concepts of Mulliken, it forms the basis of all modern computational approaches to modeling electron transfer. Its essential feature is that electron transfer can never be regarded as an “instantaneous transition”; instead, the electron is partially transferred at all molecular geometries, with the extent of the transfer being a critical quantum descriptor of all thermal, tunneling, and spectroscopic processes. It also leads seamlessly to understanding electron-transfer transition-state spectroscopy pioneered by Zewail.
In adiabatic electron-transfer theory, the ratio is of central importance. In the very strong coupling limit when Eqn. (2) is satisfied, intrinsically quantum molecules like the Crautz-Taube ion result. Most intervalence spectroscopy occurs in the weak-coupling limit described by Eqn. (1), however. In both natural photosynthesis and in artificial solar-energy capture devices, is maximized by minimiming through use of large molecules like chlorophylls, pentacenes, and conjugated polymers. The coupling can be controlled by controlling the distance R at which charge transfer occurs- the coupling typically decreases exponentially with distance. When electron transfer occurs during collisions of the D and A species, the coupling is typically large and the “adiabatic” limit applies in which rate constants are given by transition state theory. However, in biological applications as well as modern organic conductors and other device materials, R is externally constrained and so the coupling set at low or high values. In these situations, weak-coupling scenarios often become critical.
In the weak-coupling (“non-adiabatic”) limit, the activation energy for electron transfer is given by the expression derived independently by Kubo and Toyozawa and by Hush. Using adiabatic electron-transfer theory, in this limit Levich and Dogonadze then determined the electron-tunneling probability to express the rate constant for thermal reactions as
- . … (3)
This approach is widely applicable to long-range ground-state intramolecular electron transfer, electron transfer in biology, and electron transfer in conducting materials. It also typically controls the rate of charge separation in the excited-state photochemical application described in Figure 2 and related problems.
Marcus showed that the activation energy in Eqn. (3) reduces to in the case of symmetric reactions with . In that work, he also derived what is the standard expression for the solvent contribution to the reorganization energy, making the theory readily applicable to practical problems. Use of this solvation description (instead of the form that Hush originally proposed) in approaches spanning the adiabatic and non-adiabatic limits is often termed “Marcus-Hush Theory”. These and other contributions, including the widespread demonstration of the usefulness of Eqn. (3), led to the award of the 1992 Nobel Prize in Chemistry to Marcus.
Adiabatic electron-transfer theory is often also widely applied  in Molecular Electronics. In recent years it has been generalized to arbitrary chemical reactions, providing a single conceptual basis covering many different aspects of chemical research. In particular, this reconnects adiabatic electron-transfer theory with its roots in proton-transfer theory and hydrogen-atom transfer, leading back to London’s theory of general chemical reactions. In this approach, most chemical processes can be depicted in terms of the three critical parameters , and , with for example the resonance energy that makes benzene and all aromatic compounds unique being nothing other than . This approach also leads to a simple explanation in terms of the orbital Rydbergization processes discovered by Mulliken as to why first-row elements like nitrogen have bond angles around the tetrahedral angles while later-row elements have very much larger angles. Adiabatic electron-transfer theory applied in a simple one-dimensional form also provides analytical or numerically exact solutions for chemical processes not involving conical intersections, providing critical testbeds for examining failure of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation that is fundamental to chemical understanding. Similarly, it provides a basis for classifying the usefulness of general chemical reactions for applications as qubits in quantum information processors.
- 2014 Ahmed Zewail Prize for Molecular Science
- 2011 Foreign Associate of the National Academy of Sciences of USA.
- 2010 Fellow of the Royal Society of New South Wales (FRNS)
- 2007 Welch Award
- 2005 Physical Division Medal of the Royal Australian Chemical Institute (FRACI)
- 2001 Australian Federation Centenary Medal
- 2000 Inaugural David Craig Medal and Lecture of the Australian Academy of Science
- 1999 Foreign Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
- 1994 Matthew Flinders Medal and Lecture from the Australian Academy of Science
- 1993 Officer of the Order of Australia (AO)
- 1990 Centenary Medal of the Royal Society of Chemistry
- 1988 Fellow of the Royal Society of London (FRS)
- 1977 Fellow of the Australian Academy of Science (FAA)
- 1977 Fellow of the Royal Australian Chemical Institute (FRACI)
- "Hush, Noel Sydney (1924 - )". Encyclopaedia of Australian Science. Retrieved 18 September 2015.
- Faculty of Science - The University of Sydney
- "Fellows Details". Royal Society. Retrieved 18 September 2015.
- Hush, N. S. (1961). "Adiabatic theory of outer-sphere electron-transfer processes in solution". Trans. Faraday Soc. 57: 577. doi:10.1039/TF9615700557.
- Hush, N. S. (1967). "Intervalence-transfer absorption. II. Theoretical considerations and spectroscopic data". Prog. Inorg. Chem. 8: 391. doi:10.1002/9780470166093.ch7.
- Warman, J. M.; Haas, M. P. d.; Paddon-Row, M. N.; Cotsaris, E.; Hush, N. S.; Oevering, H.; Verhoeven, J. W. (1986). "Light-induced giant dipoles in simple model compounds for photosynthesis". Nature. 320: 615. Bibcode:1986Natur.320..615W. doi:10.1038/320615a0.
- Nelsen, S. F.; Ismagilov, R. F.; Trieber, D. A. (1997). "Adiabatic Electron Transfer: Comparison of Modified Theory with Experiment". Science. 278: 846. Bibcode:1997Sci...278..846N. doi:10.1126/science.278.5339.846.
- German, E. D. (1979). "Intramolecular intervalence charge transfer in bimolecular mixed-valence complexes of metals". Chem. Phys. Lett. 64: 295. Bibcode:1979CPL....64..295G. doi:10.1016/0009-2614(79)80516-3.
- Sun, D. L.; Rosokha, S. V.; Lindeman, S. V.; Kochi, J. K. (2003). "Intervalence (Charge-Resonance) Transitions in Organic Mixed-Valence Systems. Through-Space versus Through-Bond Electron Transfer between Bridged Aromatic (Redox) Centers". J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125: 15950. doi:10.1021/ja037867s.
- Nelsen, S. F.; Weaver, M. N.; Luo, Y.; Lockard, J. V.; Zink, J. I. (2006). "Use of the neighboring orbital model for analysis of electronic coupling in Class III intervalence compounds". Chem. Phys. 324: 195. Bibcode:2006CP....324..195N. doi:10.1016/j.chemphys.2006.01.023.
- Rosokha, S. V.; Kochi, J. K. (2008). "Fresh Look at Electron-Transfer Mechanisms via the Donor/Acceptor Bindings in the Critical Encounter Complex". Acc. Chem. Res. 41: 641. doi:10.1021/ar700256a.
- Robin, M. B.; Day, P. (1967). "Mixed Valence Chemistry-A Survey and Classification". Adv. Inorg. Chem. Radiochem. 10: 247. doi:10.1016/S0065-2792(08)60179-X.
- Day, P.; Hush, N. S.; Clark, R. J. H. (2008). "Mixed valence: origins and developments". Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A. 366: 5. doi:10.1098/rsta.2007.21.35.
- Hush, N. S. (1975). "Inequivalent XPS [x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy] binding energies in symmetrical delocalized mixed-valence complexes". Chem. Phys. 10: 361. Bibcode:1975CP.....10..361H. doi:10.1016/0301-0104(75)87049-2.
- London, F. (1932). "On the theory of non-adiabatic chemical reactions,". Z. Phys. 74: 143. doi:10.1142/9789812795762_0003.
- Hush, N. S. (1953). "Quantum-mechanical discussion of the gas phase formation of quinonedimethide monomers". J. Polymer Sci. 11: 289. Bibcode:1953JPoSc..11..289H. doi:10.1002/pol.1953.120110401.
- Hush, N. S. (1958). "Adiabatic rate processes at electrodes". J. Chem. Phys. 28: 962. Bibcode:1958JChPh..28..962H. doi:10.1063/1.1744305.
- Kornyshev, A. A.; Tosi, M.; Ulstrup, J. (1997). Electron and Ion Transfer in Condensed Media. Singapore: World Scientific. ISBN 978-9810229290.
- Kuznetsov, A.; Ulstrup, J. (1998). Electron Transfer in Chemistry and Biology: An introduction to the theory. Chichester: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-96749-1.
- Devault, D. (1980). "Quantum mechanical tunnelling in biological systems". Q. Rev. Biophys. 13: 387. doi:10.1017/S003358350000175X.
- Cave, R. J.; Newton, M. D. (1996). "Generalization of the Mulliken-Hush treatment for the calculation of electron transfer matrix elements". Chem. Phys. Lett. 249: 15. Bibcode:1996CPL...249...15C. doi:10.1016/0009-2614(95)01310-5.
- "Electrochemical Society Millennial Survey". Interface. 9: 20. 2000.
- Reimers, J. R.; Hush, N. S. (2017). "Relating transition-state spectroscopy to standard chemical spectroscopic processes". Chem. Phys. Lett. 683: 467. Bibcode:2017CPL...683..467R. doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2017.04.070.
- Kubo, R.; Toyozawa, Y. (1955). "Application of the Method of Generating Function to Radiative and Non-Radiative Transitions of a Trapped Electron in a Crystal". Prog. Theor. Phys. 13: 160. Bibcode:1955PThPh..13..160K. doi:10.1143/PTP.13.160.
- Levich, V. G.; Dogonadze, R. R. (1960). "Adiabatic theory for electron-transfer processes in solution". Proc. Akad. Naukl. SSSR. 133: 591.
- Levich, V. G.; Dogonadze, R. R. (1959). "Theory of rediationless electron transitions between ions in solution". Proc. Akad. Naukl. SSSR. 29: 9.
- Marcus, R. A. (1956). "On the Theory of Oxidation-Reduction Reactions Involving Electron Transfer. 1". J. Chem. Phys. 24: 966. Bibcode:1956JChPh..24..966M. doi:10.1063/1.1742723.
- Schmickler, W. Electron transfer and single molecule events (PDF). Paris: Eolss Publishers.
- Efrima, S.; Bixon, M. (1976). "Vibrational effects in outer-sphere electron-transfer reactions in polar media". Chem. Phys. 13: 447. Bibcode:1976CP.....13..447E. doi:10.1016/0301-0104(76)87014-0.
- Marcus, R. A.; Sutin, N. (1985). "Electron transfers in chemistry and biology". Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 811: 265. doi:10.1016/0304-4173(85)90014-x.
- Reimers, J. R.; McKemmish, L.; McKenzie, R. H.; Hush, N. S. (2015). "A unified diabatic description for electron transfer reactions, isomerization reactions, proton transfer reactions, and aromaticity". Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17: 24598. Bibcode:2015PCCP...1724598R. doi:10.1039/C5CP02236C.
- Horiuti, J.; Polanyi, M. (1935). "Outlines of a theory of proton transfer". Acta Physicochimica U.R.S.S. 2: 505. doi:10.1016/s1381-1169(03)00034-7.
- Reimers, J. R.; McKemmish, L.; McKenzie, R. H.; Hush, N. S. (2015). "Bond angle variations in XH3 [X=N,P,As,Sb,Bi]: the critical role of Rydberg orbitals exposed using a diabatic state model". Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17: 24618. Bibcode:2015PCCP...1724618R. doi:10.1039/C5CP02237A.
- Reimers, J. R.; McKemmish, L.; McKenzie, R. H.; Hush, N. S. (2015). "Non-adiabatic effects in thermochemistry, spectroscopy and kinetics: the general importance of all three Born-Oppenheimer breakdown corrections". Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17: 24640. Bibcode:2015PCCP...1724641R. doi:10.1039/C5CP02238J.
- McKemmish, L. K.; McKenzie, R. H.; Hush, N. S.; Reimers, J. R. (2011). "Quantum entanglement between electronic and vibrational degrees of freedom in molecules". J. Chem. Phys. 135: 244110. arXiv:1107.1105. Bibcode:2011JChPh.135x4110M. doi:10.1063/1.3671386.