National Curriculum for England

The National Curriculum for England was first introduced by the Education Reform Act 1988. At the time of its introduction the legislation applied to both England and Wales. However, education later became a devolved matter for the Welsh government. The National Curriculum is a set of subjects and standards used by primary and secondary schools so children learn the same things. It covers what subjects are taught and the standards children should reach in each subject.

The statutory National Curriculum in force as of 2023 dates from 2014,[1] when it was introduced to most year groups across primary and secondary education. Some elements were introduced in September 2015. The National Curriculum sets out the content matter which must be taught in a number of subjects in "local authority–maintained schools".[a]

Aims edit

There are two main aims presented in the statutory documentation for the National Curriculum, stating:

  1. The national curriculum provides pupils with an introduction to the essential knowledge they require to be educated citizens. It introduces pupils to the best that has been thought and said, and helps engender an appreciation of human creativity and achievements.
  2. The national curriculum is just one of the many elements in the education of every child. There is time and space in the school day and in each week, term and year to range beyond the national curriculum specifications. The national curriculum provides an outline of core knowledge around which teachers can develop exciting and stimulating lessons to promote the development of pupils’ knowledge, understanding and skills as part of the wider school curriculum.[2]

These aims set out to support the statutory duties of schools to offer a curriculum which is balanced and broadly based and which promotes the spiritual, moral, cultural, mental and physical development of pupils at the school and of society, while preparing pupils at the school for the opportunities, responsibilities and experiences of later life, as set out in the Education Act 2002.[2]

Structure edit

The National Curriculum, as released most recently in 2014, is set out for all year groups for pupils aged between 5 and 16. Within these ages, the curriculum is structured into four Key Stages, for each of which a prescribed list of subjects must be taught. The table below sets out the statutory list of subjects to be taught at each Key Stage:[2]

Subject Key Stage 1
(age 5–7)
Key Stage 2
(age 7–11)
Key Stage 3
(age 11–14)
Key Stage 4
(age 14–16)
Art & Design      
Design & Technology      
Physical Education      

For each of the statutory curriculum subjects, the Secretary of State for Education is required to set out a Programme of Study which outlines the content and matters which must be taught in those subjects at the relevant Key Stages.[3] The most recently published National Curriculum was introduced into schools in September 2014.

Other entitlements edit

In addition, children in all Key Stages must be provided with a curriculum of Religious Education, and for pupils in Key Stages 3 and 4 a curriculum of Sex and Relationships Education must also be provided.

In addition to the compulsory subjects, students at Key Stage 4 have a statutory entitlement to be able to study at least one subject from the arts (comprising art and design, music, photography, dance, drama and media arts), design and technology (comprising design and technology, electronics, engineering, food preparation and nutrition), the humanities (comprising geography and history), business and enterprise (comprising business studies and economics) and one modern language.[4]

History edit

Callaghan's Great Debate edit

In a 1976 speech at Ruskin College, Prime Minister James Callaghan launched what became known as the "Great Debate". The speech has been called "revolutionary" in the context of its time,[5] and that it "lit a flare that has illuminated education reform ever since".[6] The speech intended to stimulate wide debate on the purpose of education in the UK:

These are proper subjects for discussion and debate. And it should be a rational debate based on the facts... It is not my intention to become enmeshed in such problems as whether there should be a basic curriculum with universal standards - although I am inclined to think there should be... The goals of our education, from nursery school through to adult education, are clear enough. They are to equip children to the best of their ability for a lively, constructive, place in society, and also to fit them to do a job of work. Not one or the other but both... Both of the basic purposes of education require the same essential tools. These are basic literacy, basic numeracy, the understanding of how to live and work together, respect for others, respect for the individual. This means requiring certain basic knowledge, and skills and reasoning ability. It means developing lively inquiring minds and an appetite for further knowledge that will last a lifetime. It means mitigating as far as possible the disadvantages that may be suffered through poor home conditions or physical or mental handicap. Are we aiming in the right direction in these matters?[7]

1988 Education Reform Act edit

The first statutory National Curriculum was introduced by the Education Reform Act 1988 by Kenneth Baker.[8] The Programmes of Study were drafted and published in 1988 and 1989, with the first teaching of some elements of the new curriculum beginning in September 1989. Moreover, the curriculum was viewed as an opportunity to promote cultural and moral values.[9]

1994–1995 Shephard reforms edit

Under Gillian Shephard's tenure as Education Secretary, a review of the National Curriculum was launched in 1994, led by Ron Dearing. Its objective was to find ways to 'slim down' the over-detailed curriculum. The final report set out the need to reduce the volume of statutory content, particularly at lower key stages, as well as recommending changes to methods of assessment.[10] Consequently, an updated National Curriculum was published in 1995 which saw a considerable reduction in the content of the curriculum and a simplification in line with Dearing's recommendations.

1997–1999 Blunkett reforms edit

When a new Labour government took office in 1997, its focus on English and Mathematics led to a decision to disapply the statutory Programmes of Study for the foundation subjects from September 1998, to allow schools to spend more time teaching literacy and numeracy.[11] The Secretary of State, David Blunkett, later announced another overhaul of the National Curriculum, particularly at primary level, to reduce the content in foundation subjects allowing more time to be spent on the core subjects of English, Mathematics and Science.[12] A new National Curriculum was published in 1999, for first teaching in September 2000.[13]

2007–2008 Balls reforms edit

Further changes were announced by Ed Balls in 2007 for the statutory curriculum for Key Stages 3 and 4, which again focused on removing some content from the documentation, while also adding some additional element, with the intended aim of additional flexibility for schools.[14] These changes were introduced in September 2008, and were swiftly followed by proposed changes to the primary curriculum, based on a review to be led by Jim Rose. The review proposed replacing the 10 statutory subjects in Key Stages 1 and 2 with 6 broader 'areas of learning', such as "understanding English, communication and languages" and "human, social and environmental understanding".[15] However, following the change of government in 2010, the plans for this change - proposed to begin in September 2011 - were abandoned,[16] with schools advised to continue to follow the 2000 curriculum pending review.

2012–2014 Gove reforms edit

Following his appointment as Education Secretary in 2010, Michael Gove commissioned an expert review panel to report on a framework for a new National Curriculum. The review was led by Tim Oates of Cambridge Assessment, and reported in December 2011. It suggested significant changes to the structure of the National Curriculum, including dividing Key Stage 2 into two shorter (two-year) phases.[17]

In 2013, the government produced a draft National Curriculum, followed by a final version in September 2013, for first teaching in September 2014. Due to the short timescales for introduction, the curriculum was introduced only for certain subjects and year groups in 2014, with the core subjects in Years 2 and 6 (the final years of Key Stages 1 and 2) only becoming statutory in September 2015, to allow time for the introduction of new testing arrangements at the end of the Key Stages. Similarly, core subjects at Key Stage 4 were introduced on a year-by-year basis starting in September 2015 for English and Mathematics, and September 2016 for Science.[18]

Further reading edit

  • Stephen Meredith, 2013, The Oratory of James Callaghan: 'We used to think that you could spend your way out of a recession...'; in Andrew Crines & Richard Hayton (eds.), Labour Orators from Aneurin Bevan to Gordon Brown, Manchester University Press, 2013
  • White, John (18 April 2006). Intelligence, Destiny and Education: The Ideological Roots of Intelligence Testing. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-20387-1.

Notes edit

  1. ^ That does not include independent schools and state-funded academies – although in practice many such schools do follow the National Curriculum.
  2. ^ Languages is entitled "Foreign Languages" in Key Stage 2, and "Modern Foreign Languages" in Key Stage 3.

References edit

  1. ^ "National curriculum for England". Department for Education, UK Government. 14 October 2013 [Last updated 16 July 2014]. Retrieved 18 July 2022.
  2. ^ a b c "National curriculum in England: framework for key stages 1 to 4". Department for Education. 2 December 2014. Retrieved 14 October 2020.
  3. ^ National Archives (1 April 2018). "Education Act 2002 Part 6". H M Government. Retrieved 14 October 2020.
  4. ^ Government Digital Service. "The national curriculum: key stage 3 and 4". Retrieved 14 October 2020.
  5. ^ Callaghan's Ruskin College speech about education 25 years ago seemed revolutionary. Today, many of the issues are familiar. That's because we still haven't solved them, Will Woodward, October 2001.
  6. ^ Adonis, Andrew (17 October 2006). "30 years on, Callaghan's words resonate". The Guardian. London.
  7. ^ 'A rational debate based on the facts'; James Callaghan, Ruskin College Oxford, 18 October 1976.
  8. ^ Gillard, Derek. "History of Education in England (Chapter 8)". Education in England. Retrieved 27 July 2015.
  9. ^ Mansfield, Andrew (2022-06-15). "Increasing inclusion for ethnic minority students by teaching the British Empire and global history in the English history curriculum". Oxford Review of Education: 1–16. doi:10.1080/03054985.2022.2087618. ISSN 0305-4985. S2CID 249716765.
  10. ^ Dearing, Ron. "Dearing Review, 1994". Education in England. Derek Gillard. Retrieved 27 July 2015.
  11. ^ "English schools told to go back to basics". BBC News website. BBC. BBC. 13 Jan 1998. Retrieved 27 July 2015.
  12. ^ "National Curriculum faces overhaul". BBC News website. BBC. BBC. 15 May 1998. Retrieved 27 July 2015.
  13. ^ "Curriculum to go online". BBC News website. BBC. BBC. 15 Nov 1999. Retrieved 27 July 2015.
  14. ^ "Curriculum to be 'more flexible'". BBC News website. BBC. BBC. 12 July 2007. Retrieved 27 July 2015.
  15. ^ "Primary School subjects overhaul". BBC News website. BBC. BBC. 8 December 2008. Retrieved 27 July 2015.
  16. ^ Scholastic (10 June 2010). "Rose Review officially abandoned". Retrieved 14 October 2020.
  17. ^ The Framework for the National Curriculum. A report by the Expert Panel for the National Curriculum review. Department for Education. December 2011. Retrieved 27 July 2015.
  18. ^ H M Government (16 July 2014). "The national curriculum for England to be taught in all local authority-maintained schools". Retrieved 14 October 2020.

See also edit

Other UK curriculums edit

External links edit