A malocclusion is a misalignment or incorrect relation between the teeth of the two dental arches when they approach each other as the jaws close. The term was coined by Edward Angle, the "father of modern orthodontics", as a derivative of occlusion. This refers to the manner in which opposing teeth meet (mal- + occlusion = "incorrect occlusion").
|Malocclusion in 10-year-old girl|
The malocclusion classification is based on the relationship of the Mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar and the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar. If this molar relationship exists, then the teeth can align into normal occlusion. According to Angle, malocclusion is any deviation of the occlusion from the ideal. However the assessment for malocclusion should also take into account aesthetics and the impact on functionality. If these are aspects are acceptable to the patient despite meeting the formal definition of malocclusion, then treatment may not be necessary.
The aetiology of malocclusion is somewhat contentious, however, simply put it is multifactorial, with influences being both genetic and environmental. There are 3 generally accepted causative factors of malocclusion:
- Skeletal factors – the size, shape and relative positions of the upper and lower jaws. Variations can be caused by environmental factors such as masticatory muscles, nocturnal mouth breathing, and cleft lip and palate
- Muscle factors – the form and function of the muscles that surround the teeth. This could be impacted by habits such as digit sucking, nail biting, pacifier and tongue thrusting
- Dental factors – size of the teeth in relation to the jaw, early loss of teeth could result in spacing or mesial migration causing crowding, abnormal eruption path or timings, extra teeth (supernumeraries), too few teeth (hypodontia)
There is not one cause of malocclusion, and when planning orthodontic treatment it is often helpful to consider the above factors and the impact they have played on malocclusion.
Signs and symptomsEdit
Malocclusion is a common finding, although it is not usually serious enough to require treatment. Those who have more severe malocclusions, which present as a part of craniofacial anomalies, may require orthodontic and sometimes surgical treatment (orthognathic surgery) to correct the problem.
The ultimate goal of orthodontic treatment is to achieve a stable, functional and aesthetic alignment of teeth which serves to better the patients dental and total health. The symptoms which arise as a result of malocclusion derive from a deficiency in one or more of these categories.
The symptoms are as follows:
- Tooth decay (caries): misaligned teeth will make it more difficult to maintain oral hygiene. Children with poor oral hygiene and diet will be at an increased risk.
- Periodontal disease: irregular teeth would hinder the ability to clean teeth meaning poor plaque control. Additionally, if teeth are crowded, some may be more buccally or lingually placed, there will be reduced bone and periodontal support. Furthermore, in Class III malocclusions, mandibular anterior teeth are pushed labially which contributes to gingival recession and weakens periodontal support.
- Trauma to anterior teeth: Those with an increased overjet are at an increased risk of trauma. A systematic review found that an overjet of greater than 3mm will double the risk of trauma.
- Masticatory function: people with anterior open bites, large increased & reverse overjet and hypodontia will find it more difficult to chew food.
- Speech impairment: a lisp is when the incisors cannot make contact, orthodontics can treat this. However, other forms of misaligned teeth will have little impact on speech and orthodontic treatment has little effect on fixing any problems.
- Tooth impaction: these can cause resorption of adjacent teeth and other pathologies for example a dentigerous cyst formation.
- Psychosocial wellbeing: malocclusions of teeth with perceived poor aesthetics can have a significant effect on self-esteem. This is subjective in nature and will vary widely, being subject cultural and racial influences.
Malocclusions may be coupled with skeletal disharmony of the face, where the relations between the upper and lower jaws are not appropriate. Such skeletal disharmonies often distort sufferer's face shape, severely affect aesthetics of the face, and may be coupled with mastication or speech problems. Most skeletal malocclusions can only be treated by orthognathic surgery.
Depending on the sagittal relations of teeth and jaws, malocclusions can be divided mainly into three types according to Angle's classification system published 1899. However, there are also other conditions, e.g. crowding of teeth, not directly fitting into this classification.
Many authors have tried to modify or replace Angle's classification. This has resulted in many subtypes and new systems (see section below: Review of Angle's system of classes).
A deep bite (also known as a Type II Malocclusion) is a condition in which the upper teeth overlap the lower teeth, which can result in hard and soft tissue trauma, in addition to an effect on appearance. It has been found to occur in 15-20% of the US population.
An open bite is a condition characterised by a complete lack of overlap and occlusion between the upper and lower incisors. In children, open bite can be caused by prolonged thumb sucking. Patients often present with impaired speech and mastication.
This is a vertical measurement of the degree of overlap between the maxillary incisors and the mandibular incisors. There are three features that are analysed in the classification of an overbite:
- Degree of overlap: edge to edge, reduced, average, increased
- Complete or incomplete: whether there is contact between the lower teeth the opposing teeth/tissue (hard palate or gingivae) or not.
- Whether contact is traumatic or atraumatic
An average overbite is when the upper anterior teeth cover a third of the lower teeth. Covering less than this is described as ‘reduced’ and more than this is an ‘increased’ overbite. No overlap or contact is considered an ‘anterior open bite’.
Angle's classification methodEdit
Edward Angle, who is considered the father of modern orthodontics, was the first to classify malocclusion. He based his classifications on the relative position of the maxillary first molar. According to Angle, the mesiobuccal cusp of the upper first molar should align with the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar. The teeth should all fit on a line of occlusion which, in the upper arch, is a smooth curve through the central fossae of the posterior teeth and cingulum of the canines and incisors, and in the lower arch, is a smooth curve through the buccal cusps of the posterior teeth and incisal edges of the anterior teeth. Any variations from this resulted in malocclusion types. It is also possible to have different classes of malocclusion on left and right sides.
- Class I: Neutrocclusion Here the molar relationship of the occlusion is normal but the incorrect line of occlusion or as described for the maxillary first molar, but the other teeth have problems like spacing, crowding, over or under eruption, etc.
- Class II: Distocclusion (retrognathism, overjet, overbite) In this situation, the mesiobuccal cusp of the upper first molar is not aligned with the mesiobuccal groove of the lower first molar. Instead it is anterior to it. Usually the mesiobuccal cusp rests in between the first mandibular molars and second premolars. There are two subtypes:
- Class II Division 1: The molar relationships are like that of Class II and the anterior teeth are protruded.
- Class II Division 2: The molar relationships are Class II but the central are retroclined and the lateral teeth are seen overlapping the centrals.
- Class III: Mesiocclusion (prognathism, Anterior crossbite, negative overjet, underbite) In this case the upper molars are placed not in the mesiobuccal groove but posteriorly to it. The mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar lies posteriorly to the mesiobuccal groove of the mandibular first molar. Usually seen as when the lower front teeth are more prominent than the upper front teeth. In this case the patient very often has a large mandible or a short maxillary bone.
Review of Angle's system of classes and alternative systemsEdit
A major disadvantage of classifying malocclusions according to Angle's system is that it only takes into consideration the two-dimensional viewing along a spatial axis in the sagittal plane in the terminal occlusion, even though occlusion problems are, in principle, three-dimensional. Deviations in other spatial axes, asymmetric deviations, functional faults and other therapy-related features are not recognised. Another shortcoming is the lack of a theoretical basis of this purely descriptive classification system. Among the much discussed weaknesses of the system is the fact that it only considers the static occlusion, that it does not take into account the development and causes (aetiology) of occlusion problems and it disregards the proportions (or relationships in general) of teeth and face. Thus, numerous attempts have been made to modify the Angle system or to replace it completely with a more efficient one, but Angle's classification continues to prevail mainly because of its simplicity and clarity.
Well-known modifications to Angle's classification date back to Martin Dewey (1915) and Benno Lischer (1912, 1933). Alternative systems have been suggested by, among others, Simon (1930, the first three-dimensional classification system), Jacob A. Salzmann (1950, with a classification system based on skeletal structures) and James L. Ackerman and William R. Proffit (1969).
Besides the molar relationship, the British Standards Institute Classification also classifies malocclusion into incisor relationship and canine relationship.
Class I: The lower incisor edges occlude with or lie immediately below the cingulum plateau of the upper central incisors
Class II: The lower incisor edges lie posterior to the cingulum plateau of the upper incisors
Division 1 – the upper central incisors are proclined or of average inclination and there is an increase in overjet
Division 2 – The upper central incisors are retroclined. The overjet is usually minimal or may be increased.
Class III: The lower incisor edges lie anterior to the cingulum plateau of the upper incisors. The overjet is reduced or reversed.
Class I: Mesial slope of upper canine coincides with distal slope of lower canine
Class II: Mesial slope of upper canine is ahead of distal slope of lower canine
Class III: Mesial slope of upper canine is behind to distal slope of lower canine
Crowding of teethEdit
Crowding is defined by the amount of space that would be required for the teeth to be in correct alignment. It is obtained in two ways. 1) by measuring the amount of space required and reducing this from calculating the space available via the width of the teeth. Or 2) by measuring the degree of overlap of the teeth.
The following criteria is used:
0-4mm = Mild crowding
4-8mm = Moderate crowding
>8mm = Severe crowding
Extra teeth, lost teeth, impacted teeth, or abnormally shaped teeth have been cited as causes of crowding. Ill-fitting dental fillings, crowns, appliances, retainers, or braces as well as misalignment of jaw fractures after a severe injury are also known to cause crowding. Tumors of the mouth and jaw, thumb sucking, tongue thrusting, pacifier use beyond age three, and prolonged use of a bottle have also been identified. A small underdeveloped jaw, caused by lack of masticatory stress during childhood, can cause tooth overcrowding.
In an experiment on two groups of rock hyraxes fed hardened or softened versions of the same foods, the animals fed softer food had significantly narrower and shorter faces and thinner and shorter mandibles than animals fed hard food. Experiments have shown similar results in other animals, including primates, supporting the theory that masticatory stress during childhood affects jaw development. Several studies have shown this effect in humans. In one case, children who chewed a hard resinous gum for two hours a day, showed increased facial growth.
A 2016 review found that breastfeeding lowers the incidence of malocclusions developing later on in developing infants. 
During the transition to agriculture, the shape of the human mandible went through a series of changes. The mandible underwent a complex shape changes not matched by the teeth, leading to incongruity between the dental and mandibular form. These changes in human skulls may have been "driven by the decreasing bite forces required to chew the processed foods eaten once humans switched to growing different types of cereals, milking and herding animals about 10,000 years ago."
Malocclusion is often treated with orthodontics, such as tooth extraction, clear aligners, or dental braces, followed by growth modification in children or jaw surgery (orthognathic surgery) in adults. Surgical intervention is used only in rare occasions. This may include surgical reshaping to lengthen or shorten the jaw. Wires, plates, or screws may be used to secure the jaw bone, in a manner like the surgical stabilization of jaw fractures. Very few people have "perfect" alignment of their teeth with most problems being minor that do not require treatment.
Crowding of the teeth is treated with orthodontics, often with tooth extraction, clear aligners, or dental braces, followed by growth modification in children or jaw surgery (orthognathic surgery) in adults. Surgery may be required on rare occasions. This may include surgical reshaping to lengthen or shorten the jaw (orthognathic surgery). Wires, plates, or screws may be used to secure the jaw bone, in a manner similar to the surgical stabilization of jaw fractures. Very few people have "perfect" alignment of their teeth. However, most problems are very minor and do not require treatment.
While treatment is not crucial in class I malocclusions, in severe cases of crowding can be an indication for intervention. Studies indicate that tooth extraction can have benefits to correcting malocclusion in individuals. Further research is needed as reoccurring crowding has been examined in other clinical trials.
A few treatment options for class II malocclusions include:
- Functional appliance which maintains the mandible in a postured position to influence both the orofacial musculature and dentoalveolar development prior to fixed appliance therapy. This is ideally done through pubertal growth in pre-adolescent children and the fixed appliance during permanent dentition . Different types of removable appliances include Activator, Bionatar, Medium opening activator, Herbst, Frankel and twin block appliance with the twin block being the most widely used one. 
- Growth modification through headgear to redirect maxillary growth
- Orthodontic camouflage so that jaw discrepancy no longer apparent
- Orthonagthic surgery – sagittal split osteotomy mandibular advancement carried out when growth is complete where skeletal discrepancy is severe in anterior-posterior relationship or in vertical direction. Fixed appliance is required before, during and after surgery.
- Upper Removable Appliance – limited role in contemporary treatment of increased overjets. Mostly used for very mild Class II, overjet due to incisor proclination, favourable overbite.
Class II Division 1Edit
Low- to moderate- quality evidence suggests that providing early orthodontic treatment for children with prominent upper front teeth (class II division 1) is more effective for reducing the incidence of incisal trauma than providing one course of orthodontic treatment in adolescence. There do not appear to be any other advantages of providing early treatment when compared to late treatment. Low-quality evidence suggests that, compared to no treatment, late treatment in adolescence with functional appliances is effective for reducing the prominence of upper front teeth.
Class II Division 2Edit
Treatment can be undertaken using orthodontic treatments using dental braces. While treatment is carried out, there is no evidence from clinical trials to recommend or discourage any type of orthodontic treatment in children. A 2018 Cochrane systematic review anticipated that the evidence base supporting treatment approaches is not likely to improve occlusion due to the low prevalence of the condition and the ethical difficulties in recruiting people to participate in a randomized controlled trials for treating this condition.
The British Standard Institute (BSI) classify class III incisor relationship as the lower incisor edge lies anterior to the cingulum plateau of the upper incisors, with reduced or reversed over jet. The skeletal facial deformity is characterized by mandibular prognathism, maxillary retrognathism or a combination of the two. This effects 3-8% of UK population with a higher incidence seen in Asia.
One of the main reasons for correcting Class III malocclusion is aesthetics and function. This can have a psychological impact on the person with malocclusion resulting in speech and mastication problems as well. In mild class III cases, the patient is quite accepting of the aesthetics and the situation is monitored to observe the progression of skeletal growth.
Maxillary and mandibular skeletal changes during prepubertal, pubertal and post pubertal stages show that class III malocclusion is established before the prepubertal stage. One treatment option is the use of growth modification appliances such as the Chin Cap which has greatly improved the skeletal framework in the initial stages. However, majority of cases are shown to relapse into inherited class III malocclusion during the pubertal growth stage and when the appliance is removed after treatment.
Another approach is to carry out orthognathic surgery, such as a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) which is indicated by horizontal mandibular excess. This involves surgically cutting through the mandible and moving the fragment forward or backwards for desired function and is supplemented with pre and post surgical orthodontics to ensure correct tooth relationship. Although the most common surgery of the mandible, it comes with several complications including: bleeding from inferior alveolar artery, unfavorable splits, condylar resorption, avascular necrosis and worsening of temporomandibular joint.
Orthodontic camouflage can also be used in patients with mild skeletal discrepancies. This is a less invasive approach that uses orthodontic brackets to correct malocclusion and try to hide the skeletal discrepancy. Due to limitations of orthodontics, this option is more viable for patients who are not as concerned about the aesthetics of their facial appearance and are happy to address the malocclusion only, as well as avoiding the risks which come with orthognathic surgery.
The most common corrective treatments available are fixed or removal appliances (such as dental braces), which may or may not require surgical intervention. At this time there is no robust evidence that treatment will be successful.
An open bite malocclusion is when the upper teeth don't overlap the lower teeth. When this malocclusion occurs at the front teeth it is known as anterior open bite. An open bite is difficult to treat due to multifactorial causes, with relapse being a major concern. This is particularly so for an anterior open bite. Therefore, it is important to carry out a thorough initial assessment in order to obtain a diagnosis to tailor a suitable treatment plan. It is important to take into consideration any habitual risk factors, as this is crucial for a successful outcome without relapse. Treatment approach includes behavior changes, appliances and surgery. Treatment for adults include a combination of extractions, fixed appliances, intermaxillary elastics and orthognathic surgery. For children, orthodontics is usually used to compensate for continued growth. With children with mixed dentition, the malocclusion may resolve on its own as the permanent teeth erupt. Furthermore, should the malocclusion be caused by childhood habits such as digit, thumb or pacifier sucking, it may result in resolution as the habit is stopped. Habit deterrent appliances may be used to help in breaking digit and thumb sucking habits. Other treatment options for patients who are still growing include functional appliances and headgear appliances.
Tooth size discrepancyEdit
Identifying the presence of tooth size discrepancies between the maxillary and mandibular arches is an important component of correct orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
To establish appropriate alignment and occlusion, the size of upper and lower front teeth, or upper and lower teeth in general, needs to be proportional. Inter-arch tooth size discrepancy (ITSD) is defined as a disproportion in the mesio-distal dimensions of teeth of opposing dental arches. The prevalence is clinically significant among orthodontic patients and has been reported to range from 17% to 30%.
Identifying inter-arch tooth size discrepancy (ITSD) before treatment begins allows the practitioner to develop the treatment plan in a way that will take ITSD into account. ITSD corrective treatment may entail demanding reduction (interproximal wear), increase (crowns and resins), or elimination (extractions) of dental mass prior to treatment finalization.
Several methods have been used to determine ITSD. Of these methods the one most commonly used is the Bolton analysis. Bolton developed a method to calculate the ratio between the mesiodistal width of maxillary and mandibular teeth and stated that a correct and harmonious occlusion is possible only with adequate proportionality of tooth sizes. Bolton's formula concludes that if in the anterior portion the ratio is less than 77.2% the lower teeth are too narrow, the upper teeth are too wide or there is a combination of both. If the ratio is higher than 77.2% either the lower teeth are too wide, the upper teeth are too narrow or there is a combination of both.
Other kinds of malocclusions can be due to or horizontal, vertical, or transverse skeletal discrepancies, including skeletal asymmetries.
Increased vertical growth causes a long facial profile and commonly leads to an open bite malocclusion, while decreased vertical facial growth causes a short facial profile and is commonly associated with a deep bite malocclusion. However, there are many other more common causes for open bites (such as tongue thrusting and thumb sucking) and likewise for deep bites.
The upper or lower jaw can be overgrown (macrognathia) or undergrown (micrognathia). It has been reported that patients with micrognathia are also affected by retrognathia (abnormal posterior positioning of the mandible or maxilla relative to the facial structure). These patients are majorly predisposed to a class II malocclusion. Mandibular macrognathia results in prognathism and predisposes patients to a class III malocclusion. 
Most malocclusion studies to date have focused on Class III malocclusions. Genetic studies for Class II and Class I malocclusion are more rare. An example of hereditary mandibular prognathism can be seen amongst the Hapsburg Royal family where one third of the affected individuals with severe class III malocclusion had one parent with a similar phenotype 
The frequent presentation of dental malocclusions in patients with craniofacial birth defects also supports a strong genetic aetiology. About 150 genes are associated with craniofacial conditions presenting with malocclusions.  Micrognathia is a commonly recurring craniofacial birth defect appearing among multiple syndromes.
For patients with severe malocclusions, corrective jaw surgery or orthognathic surgery may be carried out as a part of overall treatment, which can be seen in about 5% of the general population.
Malocclusion is often hereditary but may also be acquired.
There are 3 general causative factors of malocclusion. These are skeletal factors, muscle factors and dental factors.
- Skeletal factors: size, shape and relative positions of the upper and lower jaws. These variations are caused by genetic and environmental factors. Some environmental factors include masticatory muscles, mouth breathing and head posture.
- Muscle factors: form and function of the muscles that surround the teeth such as lips, cheeks and tongue
- Dental factors: size of the teeth in relation to the size of the jaws
In the active skeletal growth, mouthbreathing, finger sucking, thumb sucking, pacifier sucking, onychophagia (nail biting), dermatophagia, pen biting, pencil biting, abnormal posture, deglutition disorders and other habits greatly influence the development of the face and dental arches.
Malocclusion can occur in primary and secondary dentition.
In primary dentition malocclusion is caused by:
- Underdevelopment of the dentoalvelor tissue.
- Over development of bones around the mouth.
- Cleft lip and palate.
- Overcrowding of teeth.
- Abnormal development and growth of teeth.
In secondary dentition malocclusion is caused by:
- Periodontal disease.
- Overeruption of teeth.
- Premature and congenital loss of missing teeth
- Bell B (September 1965). "Paul G. Spencer". American Journal of Orthodontics. 51 (9): 693–694. doi:10.1016/0002-9416(65)90262-9. PMID 14334001.
- Gruenbaum T (2010). "Famous Figures in Dentistry". Mouth – JASDA. 30 (1): 18.
- Hurt MA (2012). "Weedon D. Weedon's Skin Pathology. 3rd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, 2010". Dermatology Practical & Conceptual. 2 (1): 79–82. doi:10.5826/dpc.0201a15. PMC 3997252.
- Corruccini RS, Potter RH (August 1980). "Genetic analysis of occlusal variation in twins". American Journal of Orthodontics. 78 (2): 140–54. doi:10.1016/0002-9416(80)90056-1. PMID 6931485.
- Moimaz SA, Garbin AJ, Lima AM, Lolli LF, Saliba O, Garbin CA (August 2014). "Longitudinal study of habits leading to malocclusion development in childhood". BMC Oral Health. 14 (1): 96. doi:10.1186/1472-6831-14-96. PMC 4126276. PMID 25091288.
- Thilander B, Pena L, Infante C, Parada SS, de Mayorga C (April 2001). "Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in children and adolescents in Bogota, Colombia. An epidemiological study related to different stages of dental development". European Journal of Orthodontics. 23 (2): 153–67. doi:10.1093/ejo/23.2.153. PMID 11398553.
- Borzabadi-Farahani A, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Eslamipour F (October 2009). "Malocclusion and occlusal traits in an urban Iranian population. An epidemiological study of 11- to 14-year-old children". European Journal of Orthodontics. 31 (5): 477–84. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjp031. PMID 19477970.
- Oliver RG (December 2001). "An Introduction to Orthodontics, 2nd edn". Journal of Orthodontics. 28 (4): 320. doi:10.1093/ortho/28.4.320.
- Houston, W. J. B. (1992-02-01). "Book Reviews". The European Journal of Orthodontics. 14 (1): 69. doi:10.1093/ejo/14.1.69.
- Millett DT, Cunningham SJ, O'Brien KD, Benson PE, de Oliveira CM (February 2018). "Orthodontic treatment for deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2: CD005972. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005972.pub4. PMC 6491166. PMID 29390172.
- Brunelle JA, Bhat M, Lipton JA (February 1996). "Prevalence and distribution of selected occlusal characteristics in the US population, 1988-1991". Journal of Dental Research. 75 Spec No (2 Suppl): 706–13. doi:10.1177/002203459607502S10. PMID 8594094.
- de Castilho LS, Abreu MH, Pires e Souza LG, Romualdo LT, Souza e Silva ME, Resende VL (January 2018). "Factors associated with anterior open bite in children with developmental disabilities". Special Care in Dentistry. 38 (1): 46–50. doi:10.1111/scd.12262. PMID 29278267.
- Feres MF, Abreu LG, Insabralde NM, Almeida MR, Flores-Mir C (June 2016). "Effectiveness of the open bite treatment in growing children and adolescents. A systematic review". European Journal of Orthodontics. 38 (3): 237–50. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjv048. PMC 4914905. PMID 26136439.
- Cambiano AO, Janson G, Lorenzoni DC, Garib DG, Dávalos DT (2018). "Nonsurgical treatment and stability of an adult with a severe anterior open-bite malocclusion". Journal of Orthodontic Science. 7: 2. doi:10.4103/jos.JOS_69_17. PMC 5952238. PMID 29765914.
- Hamdan AM, Lewis SM, Kelleher KE, Elhady SN, Lindauer SJ (November 2019). "Does overbite reduction affect smile esthetics?". The Angle Orthodontist. 89 (6): 847–854. doi:10.2319/030819-177.1. PMID 31306077.
- "Angle's Classification of Malocclusion". Archived from the original on 2008-02-13. Retrieved 2007-10-31.
- Sunil Kumar (Ed.): Orthodontics. New Delhi 2008, 624 p., ISBN 978-81-312-1054-3, p. 127
- Sunil Kumar (Ed.): Orthodontics. New Delhi 2008, p. 123. A list of 18 approaches to modify or replace Angle's system is given here with further references at the end of the book.
- Gurkeerat Singh: Textbook of Orthodontics, p. 163-170, with further references on p. 174.
- Rosenberg J (2010-02-22). "Malocclusion of teeth". Medline Plus. Retrieved 2012-02-06.
- Lieberman, D (May 2004). "Effects of food processing on masticatory strain and craniofacial growth in a retrognathic face". Journal of Human Evolution. doi:10.1016/s0047-2484(04)00051-x.
- Ingervall B, Bitsanis E (February 1987). "A pilot study of the effect of masticatory muscle training on facial growth in long-face children". European Journal of Orthodontics. 9 (1): 15–23. doi:10.1093/ejo/9.1.15. PMID 3470182.
- Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ, França GV, Horton S, Krasevec J, Murch S, Sankar MJ, Walker N, Rollins NC (January 2016). "Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect". Lancet. 387 (10017): 475–90. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01024-7. PMID 26869575.
- Quaglio CL, de Freitas KM, de Freitas MR, Janson G, Henriques JF (June 2011). "Stability and relapse of maxillary anterior crowding treatment in class I and class II Division 1 malocclusions". American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 139 (6): 768–74. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.10.044. PMID 21640883.
- Alam, MK (October 2018). "Treatment of Angle Class I malocclusion with severe crowding by extraction of four premolars: a case report". Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science. 17 (4): 683–687. doi:10.3329/bjms.v17i4.38339.
- Persson M, Persson EC, Skagius S (August 1989). "Long-term spontaneous changes following removal of all first premolars in Class I cases with crowding". European Journal of Orthodontics. 11 (3): 271–82. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejo.a035995. PMID 2792216.
- von Cramon-Taubadel N (December 2011). "Global human mandibular variation reflects differences in agricultural and hunter-gatherer subsistence strategies". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 108 (49): 19546–51. Bibcode:2011PNAS..10819546V. doi:10.1073/pnas.1113050108. PMC 3241821. PMID 22106280.
- Nayak KU, Goyal V, Malviya N (October 2011). "Two-phase treatment of class II malocclusion in young growing patient". Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 2 (4): 376–80. doi:10.4103/0976-237X.91808. PMC 3276872. PMID 22346172.
- "Treatment of class ii malocclusions". 2013-11-14.
- Pinhasi R, Eshed V, von Cramon-Taubadel N (2015-02-04). "Incongruity between affinity patterns based on mandibular and lower dental dimensions following the transition to agriculture in the Near East, Anatolia and Europe". PLOS ONE. 10 (2): e0117301. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1017301P. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117301. PMC 4317182. PMID 25651540.
- Batista KB, Thiruvenkatachari B, Harrison JE, O'Brien KD (March 2018). "Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 3: CD003452. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003452.pub4. PMC 6494411. PMID 29534303.
- CLASSIFICATION OF SKELETAL AND DENTAL MALOCCLUSION: REVISITED; Mageet, Adil Osman (2016). "Classification of Skeletal and Dental Malocclusion: Revisited". Stomatology Edu Journal. 3 (2): 205–211. doi:10.25241/2016.3(2).11.
- Esthetics and biomechanics in orthodontics. Nanda, Ravindra,, Preceded by (work): Nanda, Ravindra. (Second ed.). St. Louis, Missouri. 2014-04-10. ISBN 978-0-323-22659-2. OCLC 880707123.CS1 maint: others (link)
- Eslami S, Faber J, Fateh A, Sheikholaemmeh F, Grassia V, Jamilian A (August 2018). "Treatment decision in adult patients with class III malocclusion: surgery versus orthodontics". Progress in Orthodontics. 19 (1): 28. doi:10.1186/s40510-018-0218-0. PMC 6070451. PMID 30069814.
- Uner O, Yüksel S, Uçüncü N (April 1995). "Long-term evaluation after chincap treatment". European Journal of Orthodontics. 17 (2): 135–41. doi:10.1093/ejo/17.2.135. PMID 7781722.
- Ravi MS, Shetty NK, Prasad RB (January 2012). "Orthodontics-surgical combination therapy for Class III skeletal malocclusion". Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 3 (1): 78–82. doi:10.4103/0976-237X.94552. PMC 3341765. PMID 22557903.
- Zere E, Chaudhari PK, Sharan J, Dhingra K, Tiwari N (2018-06-22). "Developing Class III malocclusions: challenges and solutions". Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry. 10: 99–116. doi:10.2147/ccide.s134303. PMC 6016584. PMID 29950903.
- Atsawasuwan P, Hohlt W, Evans CA (April 2015). "Nonsurgical approach to Class I open-bite malocclusion with extrusion mechanics: a 3-year retention case report". American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 147 (4): 499–508. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.04.024. PMID 25836010.
- Grauer D, Heymann GC, Swift EJ (June 2012). "Clinical management of tooth size discrepancies". Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 24 (3): 155–9. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8240.2012.00520.x. PMID 22691075.
- Cançado RH, Gonçalves Júnior W, Valarelli FP, Freitas KM, Crêspo JA (2015). "Association between Bolton discrepancy and Angle malocclusions". Brazilian Oral Research. 29: 1–6. doi:10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0116. PMID 26486769.
- Harrington C, Gallagher JR, Borzabadi-Farahani A (July 2015). "A retrospective analysis of dentofacial deformities and orthognathic surgeries using the index of orthognathic functional treatment need (IOFTN)". International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 79 (7): 1063–6. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.04.027. PMID 25957779.
- Posnick JC (September 2013). "Definition and Prevalence of Dentofacial Deformities". Orthognatic Surgery: Principles and Practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 61–68. doi:10.1016/B978-1-4557-2698-1.00003-4. ISBN 978-145572698-1.
- Borzabadi-Farahani A, Eslamipour F, Shahmoradi M (June 2016). "Functional needs of subjects with dentofacial deformities: A study using the index of orthognathic functional treatment need (IOFTN)". Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 69 (6): 796–801. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2016.03.008. PMID 27068664.
- Purkait, S (2011). Essentials of Oral Pathology 4th Edition.
- Joshi N, Hamdan AM, Fakhouri WD (December 2014). "Skeletal malocclusion: a developmental disorder with a life-long morbidity". Journal of Clinical Medicine Research. 6 (6): 399–408. doi:10.14740/jocmr1905w. PMC 4169080. PMID 25247012.
- Moreno Uribe LM, Miller SF (April 2015). "Genetics of the dentofacial variation in human malocclusion". Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 18 Suppl 1 (S1): 91–9. doi:10.1111/ocr.12083. PMC 4418210. PMID 25865537.
- Klein ET (1952). "Pressure Habits, Etiological Factors in Malocclusion". Am. J. Orthod. 38 (8): 569–587. doi:10.1016/0002-9416(52)90025-0.
- Graber TM. (1963). "The "Three m's": Muscles, Malformation and Malocclusion". Am. J. Orthod. 49 (6): 418–450. doi:10.1016/0002-9416(63)90167-2. hdl:2027.42/32220.
- Björk A, Helm S (April 1967). "Prediction of the age of maximum puberal growth in body height" (PDF). The Angle Orthodontist. 37 (2): 134–43. doi:10.1043/0003-3219(1967)037<0134:POTAOM>2.0.CO;2 (inactive 2020-05-29). PMID 4290545.
- Brucker M (1943). "Studies on the Incidence and Cause of Dental Defects in Children: IV. Malocclusion" (PDF). J Dent Res. 22 (4): 315–321. doi:10.1177/00220345430220041201.
- Calisti LJ, Cohen MM, Fales MH (1960). "Correlation between malocclusion, oral habits, and socio-economic level of preschool children". Journal of Dental Research. 39 (3): 450–4. doi:10.1177/00220345600390030501. PMID 13806967.
- Subtelny JD, Subtelny JD (October 1973). "Oral habits--studies in form, function, and therapy". The Angle Orthodontist. 43 (4): 349–83. PMID 4583311.
- Aznar T, Galán AF, Marín I, Domínguez A (May 2006). "Dental arch diameters and relationships to oral habits". The Angle Orthodontist. 76 (3): 441–5. doi:10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0441:DADART]2.0.CO;2 (inactive 2020-05-29). PMID 16637724.
- Yamaguchi H, Sueishi K (May 2003). "Malocclusion associated with abnormal posture". The Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College. 44 (2): 43–54. doi:10.2209/tdcpublication.44.43. PMID 12956088.
- Wellington M, Hall CB (February 2002). "Pacifier as a risk factor for acute otitis media". Pediatrics. 109 (2): 351–2, author reply 353. doi:10.1542/peds.109.2.351. PMID 11826228.
- Rovers MM, Numans ME, Langenbach E, Grobbee DE, Verheij TJ, Schilder AG (August 2008). "Is pacifier use a risk factor for acute otitis media? A dynamic cohort study". Family Practice. 25 (4): 233–6. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmn030. PMID 18562333.
- Hamish T (1990). Occlusion. Parkins, B. J. (2nd ed.). London: Wright. ISBN 978-0723620754. OCLC 21226656.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Malocclusion.|